Charles Murray described the widening class divide in America in his excellent book, Coming Apart. His biggest finding, of no surprise to people who have been around a while, is that marriage is important. In fact, it's the primary thing that separates happy, successful people from unhappy, unsuccessful people.
Now check out what that hate-filled C of E has done.
Sex is for married heterosexual couples only, says Church of England https://t.co/jDxAA96mQU— The Guardian (@guardian) January 23, 2020
Objections to this all come from the same, basic angle: "Don't tell me what to do, you irrelevant prudes!" Supporters have replied with, "It is the will of God, you infidels!"
What if that's the wrong approach?
It's well-documented to the point of being irrefutably proven that, on average, traditional families do better in every respect. Rich people get married, poor people don't. Poor people who get married typically escape poverty. Hunter Biden aside, rich people who live wastrel lives become poor. The mechanisms are simple and the consequences all around us. The reactions above are emotional, not logical.
Let's break down the C of E's proscription a different way. I see three approaches to the question of sexual propriety.
There Should Be Hard Limits On Sexual Behaviors Sourced From The Bible
This gives you an authority from which to derive your assertions and a clear set of rules to apply. If you apply them to your life, you are more likely to live a happy and successful life. On the minus side, you will have to deal with self-denial, temptation, sin and guilt.
There Should Be Some Limits Which We Will Figure Out As We Go Along
Perhaps we make pedophilia and bestiality off-limits, but we accept pornography, sex outside of marriage and homosexuality. We'll derive our limits from semi-trustworthy social science studies which are subject to political pressure. We've been trying this one for decades now and the results are mixed, to say the least. On the plus side, we have a cool rainbow flag we can wave around. On the minus side, our jails are full of kids born outside of marriage.
There Should Be No Limits At All
With this one, it's every man, woman and otherkin for themselves. All guardrails are torn down and speed limits are a thing of the past. If your behavior leads to ruin, we'll ignore the crash scene and zip right past your burning wreck as we download videos of goaty threesomes on our way to Lucinda's Bondage Dungeon. And wrecks aplenty there will be, but don't worry, the news won't report any of them.
Life Has Trade Offs
In all seriousness, what's missing in the reactions to the C of E's latest pronouncements is the acknowledgement that there are any downsides to modern, secular, sexual morality. Much of life is making choices where the outcomes are murky and mixed. Denying that these trade offs exist by screaming "Prudes!" at the C of E doesn't make them go away.
Chelsea Clinton is a seriously woke Social Justice chick and completely cool with you doing whatever floats your boat. Her children were born within marriage because she's not a dummy. |
5 comments:
If they were irrelevant, the screamers wouldn't be bothering.
What they're trying to do is pound the table.
If the facts support you, pound the facts; if the law supports you, pound the law; if neither supports you, try to emotionally blackmail people into your preferred version with illogical and frankly bullying attacks.
How weak is their case that the mere allowing of different views that they're not required to be involved in is a cause for horror and outrage?
I agree that they are pounding the table, but I don't agree it's because they are afraid of the facts. The ones I've engaged with on Twitter aren't aware of the facts and don't seem to have been exposed to any other point of view than the shouts of a crazed Papist like myself saying, "IT'S A SIN!"
That's why I'm wondering what would happen if we re-framed the discussion.
It's taught in school.
"Sex is for married heterosexual couples only, says Church of England"
What? Seriously, is someone trolling us?
The CoE has caved, predictably, to the "backlash" by Teh Ghey Agenda.
Post a Comment