I debated about posting this, wondering if it crossed the line into vulgarity, but it illustrates the dominance of the Lizard Empire, so I'm going for it.
Dig this.
Man in buttless, rainbow monkey costume with large dildo between his legs dances to promote literacy for kids outside Redbridge Library in East London, England. pic.twitter.com/Y88LJorEbF
— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) July 12, 2021
The library ended up apologizing for the event when parents expressed outrage. Good for them.
What if the pedophile groomer in the monkey costume hadn't had a dildo strapped to his crotch? My bet is that the parents wouldn't have felt comfortable complaining. It was that one accessory that pushed it over the edge.
This was a frontal assault on a fixed position by the Lizard Empire. In this case, it was repulsed. The only reason it failed was that it was too crude. The Lizardians were overconfident. They won't be next time and there will be a next time.
Pedophilia is the next step.
10 comments:
I agree the dildo was way out of line (I didn't see the buttless part in the video).
However, what makes you think this has anything to do with pedophilia? Most LGBT advocates I read are just as opposed to pedophilia as the conservatives.
Ya, I didn't see a single Catholic priest in the video
There are periodic sorties into the beastiality and pedophilia by progressives every year. It is still be repulsed. But it is a classic example of the far left pushing and pushing the boundries of acceptable behavior. Which will continue, until the destruction of society.
Mostly Nothing,
There are periodic sorties into the beastiality and pedophilia by progressives every year.
By conservatives as well. Reprehensible behavior happens all along the polictical spectrum and infects all of humanity. Why are you so keen on pretending political position affect this?
One Brow, you misunderstood what I was saying. And I wasn't clear.
Yes, there are people in power from the entire political spectrum that are scumbags. These days, it seems to be the vast majority.
What I'm referring to is the subtle pushing of boundaries of acceptable behavior.
I remember a blog post from Beers with Demo several years ago during the golden age of Obama, where he referenced an editoral in NYT saying that the left was so much smarter than the founding fathers, and that the bill of rights needed to be scrapped, because they were so much smarter, and when they aren't restricted by silly things like checks and balances, they can get on with the making things perfect, in their eyes.
Mostly Nothing,
There is no significant faction on the left pushing pedophilia or bestiality. They push informed consent as the metric, and say that neither children nor animals are capable of such.
I fully agree that you can find people saying ignorant things on the left as well, though.
There is no significant faction on the left pushing pedophilia or bestiality.
Translation:
he ignores them.
Because having schools push masturbation on 6 year olds is totally not pedo grooming, nor the rest of the "sex is inherently good and if you don't do it you are bad" baloney isn't really pedophilia, same as rape by liberals is not, to quote Whoopie, rape-rape.
I don't have specific references, but it pops up in the media every once in a while, where the opinion is made that 12 year olds can be trusted to consent to sexual acts. And they are mostly rebuked, a little lesser each time. They chip away.
Ok, I just thought of one. Cuties. Hollywood makes a soft-porn show about kids doing sexually suggestive acts.
Foxfier,
Translation: he ignores them.
You can't ignore that which does not exist.
Because having schools push masturbation on 6 year olds is totally not pedo grooming, ...
6-year-olds are not capable of masturbation, because they don't have a sexual drive (unless there physiology is extremely atypical). They do have nerves that create pleasure. Telling them that They should only explore their bodies in private is the opposite of pedo-grooming, it is anti-grooming.
However, I am curious as to why you want to believe 6-year-olds can have sexual feelings. What do you gain from that notion?
... nor the rest of the "sex is inherently good and if you don't do it you are bad" baloney isn't really pedophilia,...
Actually, most liberal spaces are very supportive of people who don't want to have sex at all. That's why there are thriving ace and aro communities on-line. OANN forget to mention that to you?
... same as rape by liberals is not, to quote Whoopie, rape-rape.
I've seen plenty of liberals cheer when noted liberals like Harvey Weinstein were sent to jail. Odd how you missed it.
Nor did Whoopi Goldberg escape liberal criticism. For example: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/john-oliver-compares-whoopi-goldbergs-808410/
Why do you think that someone as interested in these things as you is completely ignorant of how liberals actually feel?
Mostly Nothing,
I don't have specific references, but it pops up in the media every once in a while, where the opinion is made that 12 year olds can be trusted to consent to sexual acts. And they are mostly rebuked, a little lesser each time. They chip away.
You don't have any references, and your web search didn't find any, because it is not true.
Ok, I just thought of one. Cuties. Hollywood makes a soft-porn show about kids doing sexually suggestive acts.
1) Cuties was made by the French film industry, not Hollywood.
2) If you did so much as read the Wikipedia plot summary, you'd know that the ending of Cuties shows that the main character is much happier when she leaves the troupe. "Suddenly thinking about her mother during the routine, Amy bursts into tears and leaves before their performance ends." This is a movie about how early sexualization is bad for children.
Why didn't you know either of these things? Did your news sources steer you wrong, and you just didn't care enough to check them?
Post a Comment