... is this one: Who is allowed a homeland?
A secondary question is this: What happens when you are inclusive, but your "migrants" are not? Dig this.
France’s migrant gang-run no-go zones are not a right wing myth. They do exist and the police do not enter them. pic.twitter.com/yaM0eVYBaL
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) October 9, 2024
If the "migrants" attack a police car which flees, how much inclusion is that? It seems that the cops are being inclusive, but the "migrants" are not. To me, that looks like a skirmish on the front and the Frenchies lost.
Meanwhile, let's return to the Irish and, for the lack of a better example, the Congolese. Are the Irish allowed a homeland? Congo's population is 20x theirs. It wouldn't take much for the Congolese to enter Ireland and gain a voting majority. Are the Congolese allowed a homeland? I don't think it's much of a reach to assert firmly that no one would suggest that the Congo should be run by someone other than the Congolese, no matter what the results might be.
I know this is raising some very uncomfortable topics and perhaps crossing lines, but as I watch England turn Muslim and see high-profile Brits first flee London and then some of them flee the country completely, these questions occur to me. They are questions we all need to answer here in the US. The Democrats have closed the border, temporarily, for electoral purposes, so when I go to the airport here in San Diego these days, I'm not surrounded by "migrants," but that still happened.
Are Americans allowed a homeland? What is an American?
As you ponder that, dig this:
This guy wanted to see how easy it really was to book a flight with the CBP One App. So he downloaded it and tried to register.
— Insurrection Barbie (@DefiyantlyFree) October 2, 2024
Watching this should piss off every single sane, American citizen in this country.
There is nothing easier than coming into this country illegally… pic.twitter.com/01YpR8FWc9
No comments:
Post a Comment