Speaker Boehner or Ramses II, I'm not sure which. I'll have to consult with Mut. |
- Since both borrowing and spending are required for the cycle to complete itself, why does one take precedence over the other?
- It's only the House that's fussing over the debt ceiling. They've only got 1/3 responsibility for the spending. They had to compromise on the spending bills. Why doesn't he have to compromise on the debt limit?
- There's no budget even though it's required by law. The only group to have done it's duty and passed a budget are the crazed fundamentalists. Say what you will about their crazy craziness, at least they've done that. Do they get debate points for that?
- The President is required by law to submit a budget to Congress by the first Monday in February, but his people have already said that's not going to happen. I guess some laws are better than others.
- Since it's our debt and not his, is the President really on our side? There's one group of people who are trying to slow down the growth of how much I owe and another side who wants it unlimited. Why am I rooting for the side that wants to stick me with an unlimited bill?
* - I know these aren't his exact words. I'm paraphrasing here. Work with me.
3 comments:
KT: Going to have to disagree with this one. Ramses II was a virile, kick-ass pharaoh who knew how to do PR.
Boehner is the Chief Eunuch.
Hope that clarification helps. :)
I knew you'd come through!
LOL @ Mutnodjmet. Funny but oh so true.
Given the analogy, what does that make Pelosi and/or Biden?
Post a Comment