In Connecticut as in many others, the shooter turned the last bullet on himself. Had we previously banned automatic weapons, he could have gone in with a backpack full of loaded revolvers and shot, say, 12 instead of 20+. He then would have shot himself long before anyone had a chance to react. Tactically, it's like trying to stop the suicide bombers in Iraq. They had various technologies and sometimes killed a lot of people, sometimes just a few, but they were almost impossible to stop because they could strike where we were defenseless and were willing to die in the process. They are the ultimate guided weapon.
Why are they happening at all? It's not something that has happened throughout the country's history. The LA Times has a historical summary with this graphic.
Mass killings over time, 1985 to present. |
Moloch was a pagan god in the Old Testament whose worshipers sacrificed children to him. When I hear of these events, I can't help but think that it's a religious statement of some kind, even if it's not explicit. That's probably just my particular hobby horse, no more or less valid than the political ones, but there you have it.
Why the increases in sacrifices to Moloch? |
To my mind, these are the fruits of substituting the State for God and delusions about secular rationality for faith and religion, but I could be wrong. In any case, that timeline above needs to be explained in some way.
* - In 2007, there were more than 1.2 million abortions. At that annual rate, a shooting of 20 children represents a little less than 9 minutes worth of abortions. In other words, even during a mass shooting, abortionists kill at a faster rate.
6 comments:
I seem to recall a passage in Revelations in which the saints cry out to God, pleading for justice to be done. I feel that way tonight.
Others have noted a copycat effect due to the dark glory the obsessive media confer on the perpetrators. I think that is very plausible.
More people are killed yearly by drunken drivers than by firearms. Yet no one is screeching for the government to restrict sales or outright banning of vehicles. In fact, many are calling for the reduction in drunk driving laws.
Wonder why that is? Could it be that most of the anti-gun crowd wouldn't know a slingshot from a howitzer? Most seem to know the difference between a Prius and a Corolla though.
BTW- I have used my trusty Ruger to defend my safety and those around me on several occasions.
I can't say the same of my vehicle.
The fundamentals of the government killing machine's* preferred firearm are based on a 1903 design perfected in 1911 for a government contract. There have been some updates to the features and certainly to the cosmetic aspects, but the John Moses Browning design is intact.
As with most killings, the bad guy proceeded unmolested until someone else with a gun showed up. What if the someone else appeared at the beginning rather than ten minutes later?
Next time you come east we can teach you about guns and let you make up your own mind.
* You may call them police or military. But if guns are so bad, why do we buy so many for the people we call our protectors? Therefore they must be bad people because of the tools they carry. Yeah, that's it.
Good points, guys. Something else I was thinking about: Columbine ('99), Santana H.S in San Diego ('01) and now Newtown ('12) were all in predominantly white middle and upper middle class communities.
Could have our white, progressive, participation trophy culture come home to roost in our millennial males whom we've coddled and infantilized and not provided any sort of moral compass and in whom we have stressed feeling and emotion over accomplishment and achievement? Just a thought.
Post a Comment