Thursday, January 15, 2026

Stop Thinking Like A Westerner

 ... when trying to understand the Islamic world.

Two data points.


These are Islamic goons patrolling the streets of Shahsavar, Iran.

I read some long-winded analysis of the state of the Rial and why this means doom for the Mullahs, but does it really? If Allah promises you unlimited, fantastic sex in the afterlife in exchange for you fighting for his cause, is the lack of pay going to keep you at home?

How did that work out in Libya or with ISIS?

We keep trying to apply Western macroeconomics and behavioral science to a society that is entirely based on what is essentially a primer for life as a 7th Century desert warlord and his crew. Then we end up surprised that the foreign exchange rate didn't have much of an effect on the zealots.

Things certainly seem bleak for the dudes in black robes and flea-infested beards and I'd really like to see them all whacked, but who knows where this will go even if the Ayatollah buys the farm?


Monday, January 12, 2026

Word Of The Day: Autopoietic

 Autopoietic (from Greek auto, "self," and poiesis, "creation") describes systems, especially living organisms, that continuously produce and maintain themselves by creating and regenerating their own components and boundaries through self-referential processes, essentially meaning they are "self-creating" or "self-making."

A human system that is Autopoietic cannot be changed by outside information. It is impervious to data. Here are four examples.

ONE. The MSM is only obliquely covering the uprisings in Iran.

The Western liberal media is ignoring the Iranian uprising because explaining it would force an admission it is desperate to avoid: the Iranian people are rebelling against Islam itself, and that fact shatters the moral framework through which these institutions understand the world.

Ideally, to cover an uprising is not just to show crowds and slogans. It requires answering a basic question: why are people risking death? In Iran, the answer is simple and unavoidable. The people are rising up because the Islamic Republic of Iran has spent decades suffocating every aspect of life—speech, work, family, art, women, and economic survival—under a clerical system that treats liberty as a crime. There is no way to tell that story without confronting the nature of the regime.

Western media refuses to do so because it has fundamentally misunderstood Islam. Or worse, it has chosen not to understand it.

Islam, in Western progressive discourse, has been racialized. It is treated not as a belief system or a political ideology, but as a stand-in for race or ethnicity. Criticizing Islam is framed as an attack on “brown people,” Arabs, or “the Middle East,” as if Islam were a skin color rather than a doctrine...

By treating Islam as a racial identity rather than an ideology, Western media strips millions of people of their ability to reject it. Iranian protesters become unintelligible. Their rebellion cannot be processed without breaking the rule that Islam must not be criticized. So instead of listening to Iranians, the media speaks over them—or ignores them entirely.

TWO. Europe is completely misreading the moment and its place in the world.

Europe has a serious military problem for which it has no solution: Ukraine. Eager to satisfy Joe Biden, they launched into a rhetorical escalation of support for Zelensky to the end and, logically, of confrontation with the Kremlin, without having the will or ability to deliver on their promises. Without the United States—and Zelensky knows this well—Ukraine is lost. But E.U. leaders keep talking as if they are ready to launch us into World War III, except that they have neither the weapons nor the soldiers to wage it. But instead of seeking a de-escalation in rhetoric and accepting the inevitable, that only Donald Trump could force a peace agreement, however painful it might be for Ukraine, Europe continues to jump on the bandwagon of bellicosity, putting fear into its population and painting apocalyptic scenarios but little else.

THREE. European green energy plans, now well underway, ignored the fragility of the system they were building.

This narrowing of the energy supply down to a single energy carrier (electricity) was called “sector coupling.” This sector coupling was propagated and celebrated by the “Green high priests” as a sustainable model for the future. Originally, it was an attempt to correct the weakness of renewable energies, which lead to unusable surpluses during periods of high wind and solar production. These useless surpluses were intended to be pushed into the heating and vehicle sectors after storage...

(T)he attack in Berlin demonstrates to us that such an energy system, based solely on electricity, is highly vulnerable. We are learning that when the power fails, the heat supply also fails—at least when it is supposed to be generated by heat pumps. And to make matters worse, we are learning that in freezing temperatures, heat pumps face total loss due to bursting pipes.

FOUR. Minnesota's Somali looting shows the systemic failure of self-interested NGOs.

Autopoietic systems lose the capacity for the environment to redefine their purpose. Inputs still arrive, but they are reinterpreted until they are compatible with the system’s existing outputs. Feedback loops close. Contradictions are absorbed. External signals stop producing corrective changes in internal behavior.

At that point, the system is no longer adaptive relative to its original purpose. It becomes self-referential. It is capable of internally justified expansion without reference to external success.

That’s a long-winded way to explain that none of these institutions were lying in the usual sense. They were maintaining equilibrium.

This is the key point: autopoiesis becomes pathological when stability is prioritized over external correction.

The system no longer asks, Is this true?

 It asks, Is this compatible with what we already produce?

Now we tie in Helen Andrews' excellent essay, The Great Feminization. I spent a little time with AI this morning asking it to summarize what was common to all four examples above. Here's what we decided.

The Deeper Unifying Insight

Across all four:

1. Institutions confuse moral posture with competence

Virtue signaling replaces results.

2. Feedback loops close

Bad outcomes do not trigger reform — they trigger narrative adjustment.

3. Dissent is either absorbed or erased

Never allowed to invalidate the system.

4. Stability is prioritized over truth

Even when stability accelerates long-term failure.

5. External reality becomes an enemy

Reality is dangerous because it can falsify internal logic.

That sounds exactly like our diocese' synodal processes and endless support for the "migrants" at the expense of the American "marginalized." The contradiction involved is denied or dismissed. Since our synodal process is deeply and pathologically feminine, fitting into Helen's thesis perfectly, how about these four examples. Do they fit as well?

The Unifying Move Andrews Makes

Andrews explains autopoietic institutional failure as the downstream effect of demographic feminization combined with legal–bureaucratic enforcement of feminine group norms.

In other words:

The systems described earlier did not become self-referential by accident or ideology alone.

They became so because the dominant mode of conflict resolution, truth evaluation, and legitimacy production inside them fundamentally changed.

She identifies the Great Feminization as the force that reoriented institutions away from:

  • truth-seeking
  • adversarial testing
  • rule-bound process
  • outcome-based evaluation

and toward:

  • consensus maintenance
  • emotional validation
  • narrative safety
  • cohesion over correction

That shift is precisely what produces the closed feedback loops you identified earlier.

Bingeaux, as we say on the bayou.

Men and women, male and female, are complimentary. Both are necessary. When only one dominates, you get things like the Germans moving to nothing but electricity, the Minnesotans handing their ATM cards to the Somalis and delusions about European militaries and Iranian uprisings.

To borrow from an old post of mine ...

Does God have a plan, a template, an objective moral structure for sex or not? If not, why not? How did He manage to overlook our strongest evolutionary motivating force?

If He does have an objective moral structure for sex, why is it different than what JPII laid out in Theology of the Body?

BOOM.
"I'll just leave this little pamphlet here. You may read it at your leisure ..."

Theology of the Body is about more than just the horizontal monkey dance. It's also about our need for the mental and emotional outlook provided by the other sex. Remove one or the other and you end up with a real mess, one which cannot self-correct.

Saturday, January 10, 2026

Minneapolis Hubris

 This photo perfectly captures the modern AWFL*.


I've seen that same facial expression in a couple of women on our Parish Synod team. They're the ones going on at length about the migrants and about how our parish is insulated from the real world, read: we're too white.

If you don't know, that's the AWFL what took a bullet to the dome the other day while doing stupid things with her car around Federal law enforcement officers. She's the very model of the Greek tragedy concept of hubris. AI defines that as follows:

In Greek tragedy, what comes before nemesis is hubris.

The classic moral sequence is:

Hubris → Atē → Nemesis

Here’s how it works:

Hubris (ὕβρις)

Arrogance, pride, or overreaching—especially toward the gods or the moral order. The hero believes he is above limits, law, or fate.

Atē (ἄτη) (often implicit)

A state of delusion or moral blindness sent by the gods. Because of hubris, the character can no longer see clearly and makes disastrous choices.

Nemesis (νέμεσις)

Retribution or divine justice. Not mere revenge, but the restoration of balance through punishment.

In short:

Hubris blinds → Atē misleads → Nemesis restores order

I think that's a good summation for what happens to AWFLs when they try to translate their devouring mother tendencies into the real world.

Adam Carolla said it much more bluntly here.

* - AWFL: Affluent, White, Female Liberal

Friday, January 09, 2026

Playing The Lotto In Tehran And Minneapolis

What comes next after this?

How about after this?

In California, or should I say Delaware, one of the original founders of Google is leaving California before the "Billionaire's Tax" hits him.

When the lottery jackpot gets above $1B, we usually play. We buy 20 tickets which amounts to $40. It typically takes about 3-4 drawings for the jackpot to be hit, so we blow $120 - $160 on that silliness. It's OK if you can afford to set fire to $160, which we can. If we had credit card debt and car payments and student loans, it wouldn't be innocent fun, it would be stupid.

Iran's inflation rate is around 50%. Mostly Nothing would tell you that good, hardworking people are leaving Minneapolis, not going there. California's exodus is well-known.

Even if the Mullahs put down the revolt, the mood of the labor force will be dark and the damage to the nation's fixed assets will be significant. Even if ICE is chased out of Minneapolis, the mood of citizens with portable skills and wealth will be more pessimistic. Smart people in California openly talk about exit strategies. For the authorities in each locale, this is playing the Lotto on a grand scale when you're in deep financial trouble, where the payoff is the achievement of a progressive utopia with about the same odds of success.

I can imagine NYC is the same way right about now.

What's the end product of all of this? TJ slums for everyone?

Winning?

Monday, January 05, 2026

You Can't Make Generalizations

 ... except when you can.

No one would suggest that you would want to mix Nazis and Jews. No one would suggest you would want to mix Aztecs and Conquistadors. You wouldn't want to mix Klansmen and black children, either.

If it happened in the sufficiently distant past and we've been acculturated to picking out the good guys from the bad guys in the group dynamics, then making generalizations about people is not only allowable, it's desirable. Only airheads like Nick Fuentes would make positive noises about the Nazis. Only unredeemed racists would say good things about the Klan.

We can admit that some groups should not mix, but only if it involves people who are no longer alive or at least no longer present in significant numbers.

If it happened in the past, why isn't it happening now? If we all agree that in the distant past, there were groups that oppressed, exploited or simply parasitized others, what about today? Where was the line drawn and who drew it putting an end to such things?

Beats me.

After being exposed for pervasive fraud schemes of all sorts, some of the Minneapolis Somalis decided to show Jussie Smollett just how this low-IQ hoax thing was done.

Bonus Data Point

Dig this.

"Somalia’s Ambassador to the UN Abukar Dahir Osman was a healthcare administrator in Ohio. There is another healthcare company in the SAME SUITE as his with a different name, and multiple others at the same address, all with Somali names."


You can't blame a homeboy for wanting a piece of the action, can you?

Nothing to see here, No generalizations to be made. Please move along, citizens...

Swedish Update

Sweden, in their ultra-feminine empathy, took in a ton of Syrians, Ethiopians and Somalis over the last 10 years. Sweden has always been known for meatballs, herring, Pippi Longstocking and snow. You can now add hand grenade attacks to that list, but be sure not to make any generalizations about the "migrants."

Monday, December 29, 2025

Somali Jenga

By now, this video has been viewed over 110,000,000 times.

It shows clearly how the Somalis in Minnesota have systematically looted the public treasury through fraudulent claims on social services. The rot is so widespread that it is impossible to believe that there are more than a couple dozen Somalis who didn't know it was happening. None of them ratted out their fellow Somalis.

Between this, the other known Somali fraud schemes, speeches by Somali politicians declaring their primary allegiance is to other Somalis and the state of Somalia itself, it is obvious that Somalis as a people are utterly incompatible with America.

The MSM has not yet begun to cover the story.

The reason is simple. They cannot afford to allow us to have rational, sensible discussions about whether or not Somalis can live in the US in any significant numbers at all. As I said above, there are serious arguments to be made against allowing them in our country. This is similar to the way the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs were covered up for a decade and more in England. The public could not be allowed to see the reality of the industrial-scale, deliberate rape of British white girls.

DEI is a Jenga tower. If you pull out the Somali brick or the Pakistani brick, there will be no end to the other bricks that will be questioned. The social justice tower is so fragile that it cannot afford any subgroup to be objectively questioned with hard data.

Friday, December 26, 2025

The Situation As It Stands

 ... is that a large chunk of the population sees what's happening, but our Elites do not.

Dig these two data points.

If you're fighting on your territory, the situation is pretty dire. If your leadership doesn't even know there's a war going on, the situation is really dire. If both are true, then steps need to be taken.

Monday, December 22, 2025

This Is Not 1938

 Have you ever wondered what the story was behind this?

I just read the essay and it's unlike anything I had expected. It is plain-spoken, bold and predictive. Here's an illustrative snippet.

(T)he figure of Adolf Hitler strode over a cringing Europe with all the swagger of a conqueror. Not the mere fact that the Führer brought 10,500,000 more people (7,000,000 Austrians, 3,500,000 Sudetens) under his absolute rule made him the Man of 1938. Japan during the same time added tens of millions of Chinese to her empire. More significant was the fact Hitler became in 1938 the greatest threatening force that the democratic, freedom-loving world faces today.

For those who feel the Catholic Church was utterly supine, Time had this to say.

In religion, the two outstanding figures of 1938 were in sharp contrast save for their opposition to Adolf Hitler. One of them, Pope Pius XI, 81, spoke with “bitter sadness” of Italy’s anti-Semitic laws, the harrying of Italian Catholic Action groups, the reception Mussolini gave Hitler last May, declared sadly: “We have offered our now old life for the peace and prosperity of peoples. We offer it anew.”

That was only partially supine. In the end, it wasn't "offering our lives" in the sense the Pope meant that did the trick by 1945, it was offering healthy portions of artillery shells and bullets as well.

Still, the writers at Time and maybe a couple in the Vatican were clear-eyed in their assessment of the situation. Our assessment of what is happening today? Not so much. Citizen journalists are putting the situation right in front of our noses, just as they did with the illegal alien invasion under Biden, but, unlike the writers at Time in 1938, our Smart Set is in total denial.

Friday, December 12, 2025

Charity For The Bishop

The more I interact with bishops and clergy, the more sympathy I have for them as men. I know, that certainly doesn't come out on this blog, but maybe it will in the future, starting now.

If you haven't read Helen Andrews' The Great Feminization, it is one of the greatest essays of 2025, quite possibly the best. It deals with the pathological femininity that has taken over the West. Here are just a few snippets from it. I can't recommend it highly enough. Read the whole thing.

This cancellation (of Larry Summers at Harvard) was feminine, the essay argued, because all cancellations are feminine. Cancel culture is simply what women do whenever there are enough of them in a given organization or field. That is the Great Feminization thesis, which the same author later elaborated upon at book length: Everything you think of as “wokeness” is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization.

The explanatory power of this simple thesis was incredible. It really did unlock the secrets of the era we are living in. Wokeness is not a new ideology, an outgrowth of Marxism, or a result of post-Obama disillusionment. It is simply feminine patterns of behavior applied to institutions where women were few in number until recently...

Everything you think of as wokeness involves prioritizing the feminine over the masculine: empathy over rationality, safety over risk, cohesion over competition...

Female group dynamics favor consensus and cooperation. Men order each other around, but women can only suggest and persuade. Any criticism or negative sentiment, if it absolutely must be expressed, needs to be buried in layers of compliments. The outcome of a discussion is less important than the fact that a discussion was held and everyone participated in it.

Emphasis mine. That last sentence perfectly encapsulates synodality within the Church. Helen's essay is a perfect summary of the modern Church itself. I don't have time to find it now, but there is a direct quote, repeated in our synod meetings, that says almost that same bolded sentence, verbatim. The conversation is the goal.

It has finally dawned on me that our Church leaders and the AWFLs that populate our diocesan and parish staffs are completely impervious to data that contradicts their devouring mother tendencies. For them, every problem is a baby and every solution is cuddling and nothing can move them off of top dead center. Nothing.

Tens of thousands of white, working class, British girls were groomed and gang raped by gangs of Pakistani Muslims. Nope, doesn't matter. Don't judge. Be nice.

Thousands of young women were seduced into transgenderism resulting in bodily mutilation and irreversible, hormonal poisoning. Affirm them. God loves people of all kinds.

A hundred thousand or more Nigerian Christians have been killed by Muslim paramilitaries over the past few years. Pray for peace.

I wish I could find it now, but Rod Dreher tweeted once that if the gang rapes in England weren't enough to light a fire under the church and drive it to militancy in defense of its daughters, then nothing would.

Nothing will. Not with the bishops, priests and AWFLs who infest the management teams. It's not that they're evil or trying to do bad things, it's that they are operating under rigid, indestructible information filters that don't allow data like what I listed above to penetrate their world view.

There's got to be another angle to pursue, one which I haven't had time to suss out yet. In the meantime, simply pointing out their inability to cope with current events is a waste of time. As long as we are dominated by The Great Feminization, the Church will continue to be totally incapable of a proper response.


Even when they know this happened, they can't interpret it properly.

Tuesday, December 09, 2025

Sunshine Dog

I've been deep in other projects which I will share later. I didn't want the blog to flicker and go out entirely, so here's a photo of Leah, our sunshine dog. She's an old lady now and things hurt that she cannot tells us. She loves the sunshine, even on the hottest of San Diego days.

There's not much in life sweeter to me than to see her basking in the sun, warming her old bones.

Monday, December 01, 2025

Full Stack Somalis

By now, news of the Somali piracy in Minnesota has spread far and wide.

Our investigation shows what happens when a tribal mindset meets a bleeding-heart bureaucracy, when imported clan loyalties collide with a political class too timid to offend, and when accusations of racism are cynically deployed to shield criminal behavior. The predictable result is graft, with taxpayers left to foot the bill.

If you were to design a welfare program to facilitate fraud, it would probably look a lot like Minnesota’s Medicaid Housing Stabilization Services program. The HSS program, the first of its kind in the country, was launched with a noble goal: to help seniors, addicts, the disabled, and the mentally ill secure housing. It was designed with “low barriers to entry” and “minimal requirements for reimbursement.” Nonetheless, before the program went live in 2020, officials pegged its annual estimated price tag at $2.6 million.

Costs quickly spiraled out of control. In 2021, the program paid out more than $21 million in claims. In the following years, annual costs shot up to $42 million, then $74 million, then $104 million. During the first six months of 2025, payouts totaled $61 million.

Essentially, once the Somalis and their progressive allies had assembled a full stack from political leaders at the top to doctors, clinics and "patients" at the bottom, they went full-throttle and looted the system. Because they had participants at every level, catching and punishing them was near impossible and they were able to run this racket and others like it for years. We're talking 9-figure sums in total and possibly more.

Lesson Learned: If your "migrants" have concentric circles of loyalty like clan, religion, nation of origin and you, the American chump, are on the outside of those rings, you're going to get taken to the cleaners. Which the Americans in Minnesota were, on an industrial scale.

I worked with ChatGPT and we got this map of the Somali stack.

Not all of the slots were occupied by Somalis such as the law enforcement managers in the Community Political Shield section. Some of those slots were dutifully filled by social justice Americans like Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey. He recently won re-election, running against a Somali communist. Dig how Frey gave part of his acceptance speech in Somali.

Well, OK then.

If the Somalis' loyalty is indeed those concentric circles, then we're going to have to fight it in the schools by vigorously attacking those concepts.

Oh, wait, never mind. Our schools have been completely captured by the social justice left. Never mind.

That leaves us with ... what? And it's not just Minneapolis, it's Dearborn, MI which is now majority-Muslim. God only knows what kinds of criminal looting is going to happen in NYC now.

The West in general, America in particular and the Catholic Church as well are all utterly incapable of dealing with this threat right now. We can't even name it because to do so would be judgmental.

This isn't going to end well anywhere.

Monday, November 24, 2025

A Little Bit On Trump's Ukrainian Peace Plan

I've heard all kinds of hand-wringing about Trump caving to Putin over the latest peace plan for the pointless bum fight between UKR and RUS. Allow me to suggest a historical analogy.

What kind of peace plan would you have offered to France in early May 1940, just before the German breakout across the Meuse?

The Slavic bum fight between the two sclerotic, dying nations of UKR and RUS is an infantry / drone / artillery battle and in those, the side with the most young men to kill typically wins. What if the Ukrainians have exhausted all their reserves and their line is only thinly held with no reserves behind it? Given how long the meat grinder has been grinding, that's very likely. If that's the case, then any peace treaty is going to be clearly one-sided. Putin is going to get what he wants one way or another.

Meanwhile, the real war continues to rage, unreported.

Saturday, November 22, 2025

How The Great War Might Have Been Avoided, Saving Europe

 ... if only the Great Men of Europe had been henpecked and whipped and the relationships between the Great Ladies of Europe, the real powers behind the thrones, had resembled nothing so much as the most dysfunctional sorority house in history...

"The July Crisis—Sorority Edition"

Europe, Summer 1914. The men think they are in charge. They are not.


It began, as these things often do, with a single dramatic incident.
Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been shot, yes. But what truly destabilized Europe was the telegram his widow sent to her friends.

Within hours, Europe’s queens, grand duchesses, tsarinas, and empresses were aflame with gossip, outrage, and accusations of “insufficient sympathy,” “boundary violations,” and “people not staying in their lanes.”

The men, meanwhile, were doing what they always did in such situations:
Trying to look important, and quietly praying their wives would not call them into the room.


Austria-Hungary’s Countess Sophie: Ready to Burn Bridges

Countess Sophie erupted first.

Her message to the other great ladies was unmistakable:

“Serbia is officially dead to me.
And if anyone tries to stop me, YOU will be dead to me too.”

Vienna’s official estates trembled.
The ministers tried to caution the Emperor, only to hear the Empress clearing her throat behind him.

“No, no,” Franz Joseph stammered. “My dear says we must be firm. Very firm. War-level firm. Or at least… strongly worded ultimatum firm?”

The Empress nodded.

And so Austria composed an ultimatum with all the tact of a woman who had been personally insulted at a garden party.


Germany’s Empress Auguste Viktoria: The Loyal Enabler

When Austria turned to Germany for support, Kaiser Wilhelm prepared to give a calm speech about “regional stability.”

His wife interrupted before he finished the first sentence.

“You WILL support Sophie, Wilhelm.
She is our friend.
You are NOT going to embarrass me in front of the ladies by hesitating.”

The Kaiser wilted instantly.

“Full support,” he squeaked to his general staff.
“Unconditional. Irrevocable. No backsies.”

The generals nodded gravely.
They, too, were married.


France’s Madame Poincaré: Grievance Archivist-in-Chief

When the news reached Paris, Madame Poincaré already had a scrapbook filled with every perceived German slight of the last 40 years.

She snapped it open, pointed to a random page—
("Look at this! They marched through Metz without even asking!")
—and declared:

“If Germany supports Austria, then we support Serbia.
Not because we like Serbia,
but because Germany is being dramatic again.”

President Poincaré tried to object.
His wife stared him down.

He changed his mind.


Russia’s Tsarina Alexandra: Loyal to Serbia for Reasons No One Understands

The Tsar had hoped that—just this once—Russia could remain calm.

No such luck.

Alexandra swept into his study, holding telegrams from half a dozen Balkan royals.

“Nicholas, Serbia needs us.
Those poor boys are being BULLIED.”

Nicholas blinked.

“Are… are we talking about the assassins?”

His wife glared.

He ordered partial mobilization within the hour.


Britain’s Queen Mary: The Absolute Monarch of Shade

Across the Channel, Queen Mary listened as the Foreign Office presented a clear, rational plan to avoid entanglement, maintain peace, and give no automatic guarantees.

When they finished, she rose, smoothing her dress.

“Gentlemen, France is being mistreated, Germany is acting out, Russia is overwrought, and Austria is behaving like a common aunt from the countryside.
Obviously, we must prepare for everything.”

Prime Minister Asquith opened his mouth.

She handed him her teacup.

“Do as I say.”

He left immediately for the War Office.


By Mid-July: Alliances Flip Hourly

The great powers changed positions so frequently that diplomats began wearing chalkboards around their necks:

  • Monday morning: France & Russia are furious at Germany

  • Monday afternoon: France is furious at Russia

  • Monday evening: Russia is furious at France

  • Tuesday: Austria is furious at literally everyone

  • Wednesday: Britain has declared all parties “deeply disappointing”

  • Thursday: Germany is in trouble for something Wilhelm’s uncle said in 1898

  • Friday: Serbia is crying in the bathroom

  • Saturday: Belgium is hiding behind Luxembourg, terrified someone will notice her

The men tried to hold conferences.
They tried maps.
They tried speeches.

But every time they neared agreement, one imperial consort would discover:

  • a tone in someone’s telegram,

  • an attitude in someone’s ambassador,

  • or a look in someone’s royal portrait.

And the alliances would reshuffle again.


By August 1st: No One is Speaking to Anyone

Europe entered August the way a dysfunctional sorority enters finals week:

  • everyone crying,

  • everyone angry,

  • no one remembering what started the fight,

  • and everyone convinced it is definitely someone else’s fault.

The men finally produced a formal diplomatic declaration asking their wives to please let them know if war was happening.

None of the ladies responded.

But overnight, every nation’s army began mobilizing simultaneously—
not because of treaties,
not because of plans,
but because all the generals received messages signed:

“Fine.
Do what you want.
I don’t even care anymore.”

And that was how the Great Powers began to stumble towards war:

Not because of nationalism.
Not because of militarism.
Not because of alliances.

But because no one wanted to be the first husband to walk back into the sitting room and tell his wife he had disappointed her.

“The July Crisis—Aborted Mobilization and the Retreat to the Gun Room”

A continent mobilizes… then demobilizes… then remobilizes… then simply lies down.


I. Mobilization Begins—Sort Of

By late July, every Great Power had begun mobilizing, though “mobilizing” may be too generous a term.

Austria-Hungary tried to move troops toward Serbia, but the Archduchesses were still arguing about whether the ultimatum had been too mean, not mean enough, or “like something a desperate woman would send at 1 in the morning after too much Tokaji.”

Germany issued sweeping mobilization orders, only for Empress Auguste Viktoria to override them twelve hours later because she had received a catty letter from Alexandra of Russia, and under no circumstances was she allowing Wilhelm to “look overeager.”

France mobilized, but on the second day Madame Poincaré froze troop movements because she was angry about a French ambassador’s tone toward the British Foreign Office’s secretary’s niece.

Russia mobilized, but Alexandra halted the trains because she heard Austria’s Sophie had called her “dramatic,” which triggered three hours of palace pacing and six pages of passive-aggressive telegrams.

Britain, always composed, announced “precautionary measures short of war,” only for Queen Mary to revoke them after learning the French ambassador’s wife was wearing her preferred tiara design to a charity ball.

Belgium hid under the dining room table.


II. Catfights on a Continental Scale

The women exchanged telegrams hourly.

These were not diplomatic messages.

These were:

  • accusations

  • insinuations

  • re-litigations of 30-year-old snubs

  • critiques of table manners

  • unexpected references to long-deceased relatives

  • accusations of “copying my alliance pattern”

The official transcripts would have required new categories in the national archives:
“Diplomatic, Hostile, and Deeply Personal.”

Ministers attempted conferences, but each time the women learned one husband had agreed with another husband, they immediately overturned the agreement on the grounds of “loyalty issues.”

At one point the Tsar and Kaiser nearly reached a peaceful resolution—until Alexandra discovered that Wilhelm’s wife had written “LOL” in the margin of her last letter.

Russia remobilized within the hour.

Germany demobilized out of spite.

France remobilized to impress Britain.

Austria mobilized, demobilized, then mobilized again because Sophie genuinely forgot which stage they were in.

Britain mobilized, then unmobilized, because Queen Mary said the whole continent was behaving "like unsupervised debutantes."


III. The Men’s Breaking Point

By the final week of July, every man in power understood a simple truth:

There would be no war without their wives' permissions—and the women weren’t speaking to anyone, including their own husbands.

In Berlin, Vienna, Petrograd, Paris, and London, the great statesmen sat in their offices, staring at maps, signatures, mobilization orders, telegrams, and alliance treaties that changed meaning every six hours.

Eventually, in each capital, a senior minister uttered some version of:

“Gentlemen… I don’t think we’re in charge of this.”


IV. Retreat to the Gun Room

And so, in the greatest act of male solidarity since the Crusades, the entire ruling class of Europe slunk quietly out of the drawing rooms and into their private sanctuaries.

In London, they gathered in the Admiralty’s gun room, where the air was thick with cigar smoke, pipe smoke, and defeated sighs.

In Berlin, the Kaiser found his generals already seated around a sturdy walnut table, brandy in hand, muttering things like:

“Just let them sort it out,”
and
“If we keep very quiet, perhaps they’ll forget about us.”

In Petersburg, the Tsar sagged into a leather chair as his ministers poured him three fingers of Armenian cognac and handed him a deck of cards.

In Vienna, even aged Franz Joseph joined in, too tired to pretend he had any control left.

Across Europe, the men all gave the same soft, defeated toast:

“May they settle it themselves… and may none of us be asked for an opinion.”

They lit cigars.
They dealt whist.
They poured more brandy.

For the first time in weeks, they felt safe.


V. The Women Continue the War of Words

Meanwhile, upstairs, in palaces and embassies across the continent, the ladies continued their diplomatic warfare with renewed fury:

  • France accused Russia of being too emotional.

  • Russia accused France of being too proud.

  • Austria accused Serbia of playing victim.

  • Serbia accused Austria of being a bully.

  • Germany accused absolutely everyone of gossiping about Germany.

  • Britain accused all of them of being uncouth and provincial.

No armies moved.
No bullets fired.

But the judging, the side-eye, and the monogrammed stationary burned hotter than any artillery barrage.


VI. And So Europe Was Saved From War—By Exhaustion

By August’s end, the mobilization orders had been written, canceled, rewritten, rescinded, revised, reissued, and finally shredded.

The men remained content in their smoky gun rooms, shields of oak and brandy insulating them from every incoming shrill telegram.

The women eventually tired, too—falling into smaller, more manageable group chats, forming alliances that lasted just long enough to complain about the alliances that broke down yesterday.

Europe settled into a new kind of balance:
Not a balance of power,
but a balance of pettiness.

And so the Great War never happened.

Because the entire continent was simply too exhausted to remember what they were fighting about.

"In the state she's in, I'd rather face British Maxim guns than go back into the drawing room and talk to my wife."

Friday, November 21, 2025

Aliens Prevent WW I

 ... or maybe cats.

A Meeting of the German High Command (with Cats)

Berlin, July 1914. A warm afternoon. Sun streaming in. Cats everywhere.

No one remembered who first brought a cat into the General Staff conference room. Some said it was Moltke, who blamed it on his wife. Others swore it was the Kaiser himself, insisting that even Caesar had a cat—or would have, had he possessed proper breeding.

Regardless of its origin, by the time the meeting began, every member of the German high command had one.

And every one of them was purring.


The Room Settles… Slowly

The Kaiser entered first, settling into his armchair with a large marmalade tom. He attempted a regal posture but immediately slouched when the creature began kneading his uniform coat with large, luxuriant paws.

"Right," Wilhelm said, stroking absentmindedly. "Mobilization… yes, mobilization."

Next came Moltke the Younger with a long-haired gray cat that draped itself across his forearms. He tried to extricate one hand to point at the map of Europe—ineffectually.

“We must strike at France before Russia… can… hmm… yes well…” His voice drifted off as the gray fluffball performed a full-body stretch across his lap.

General von Falkenhayn arrived last, accompanied by a sleek black creature who claimed the head of the table. Falkenhayn opened his briefing folder, stared at the complex timetables within, then, with a small sigh, set it aside when the cat began vibrating with a powerful purr.

“Perhaps,” he murmured, “our current level of preparedness is… satisfactory.”


Productivity Falls to Zero

On the wall, the grand map of the Schlieffen Plan—arrows swooping heroically toward Paris, timetables layered with precision—began to blur in everyone’s mind.
The Kaiser, attempting to recall the finer points of the plan, instead scratched under his cat’s chin.

“Now… where were we? Something about Belgium?”

Moltke shook his head sleepily.

"Belgium… mmm… too many fences. Too many schedules. Honestly, Your Majesty, who has the energy?"

"Quite," the Kaiser agreed. “So many telegraphs… so many trains… very tiresome.”

He yawned wide enough to startle his own cat, who retaliated by headbutting him until he resumed stroking.

Falkenhayn attempted one last effort at military seriousness:

“We could still enact the Schlieffen timetable if—”

His cat rolled onto its back, belly exposed.

Falkenhayn melted immediately.

“Well… perhaps tomorrow.”


The Great Unraveling

Minutes passed. Or an hour. Hard to say.

One by one, the generals sank deeper into their chairs, becoming as limp and drowsy as their charges.

Someone mumbled something about Russian mobilization, but another yawn cut them off.

Someone else suggested sending a telegram to Vienna, but everyone agreed that the Austrians were terribly fussy people and could surely manage without German interference for just a few more days.

The Kaiser, with a sudden sleepy epiphany, murmured:

“You know… I’m starting to think all this… urgency… all this marching and counter-marching… may not be strictly necessary.”

The cats purred louder. A wave of somnolent peace enveloped the room.

Moltke nodded sagely.

“We should perhaps consider… slower options.”

“Much slower,” Falkenhayn added.

“Infinitely slow,” murmured the Kaiser, his eyes now fully closed.



Wednesday, November 19, 2025

Why Obamacare And Its Cousins Always Fail

Dig this.

She's fat. She knows she's fat. We know she's fat. We all know she's going to slorp down a lot more medical resources than she would if she took care of herself, but she doesn't. If she paid a much higher percentage of her own health care costs, she might. As long as she gets her treatments for free or almost free, she's not going to be as motivated to get healthy. As a consequence, open your wallets, boys and girls.

And don't get me started about obesity in the black community. 4 out of 5 black women are obese. When I was in Jackson, MS a while back, it was simply stunning to see the enormity, ha ha, of the problem. I went to a mall, trying to find a camo Ole Miss hat and I swear, every single store entrance was effectively single file because of the boxcar-sized black women going in and out of them.

Monday, November 17, 2025

ChatGPT Fiction Gets Better

 Sorry for the long hiatus. I'm back to playing with AI (read: ChatGPT) writing fiction. I've discovered a good shortcut is to pattern characters after well-known actors and actresses. In my Bobby Lee Bond Southern Superspy stories, I'm using Dirk Benedict's Templeton Peck, aka Face, from the old A-Team TV series.

For Bobby Lee's MI6 counterpart, Basil “Baze” Carberry-Smythe, I'm using the old British comic actor, Terry Thomas.

Once I have some candidate templates for the characters, I ask AI to give me some screen tests in the form of scenes. Here's one that just hit the perfect spot for me showing that Terry Thomas was indeed the right man for the job.

(In the supervillain's lair, right at the climax of the story.) Cat pads up, tail twitching with smug malevolence, and presses the enormous glowing button despite Basil’s very clear instruction: “Do. Not. Touch. Anything.”

The lair erupts in catastrophic fireworks, space-borne superlasers scything through the mountain, vaporizing billions in research funding and decades of villainous ambition.

As the shockwave clears, Basil brushes dust from his lapels, checks his cufflinks, and mutters:

“Oh, splendid. The one button we weren’t supposed to press. Marvelous work, feline.”

Or alternately:

“Well, that’s that holiday cancelled. Again.”

Or (peak Terry-Thomas):

“Dash it all, Bobby, must we always bring the cat?”

Followed by, with a sigh and a resigned stroll toward the exit:

“Right then. Anyone for luncheon?”

It doesn't do longform prose very well and it struggles with prolonged dialog, but it's a ton of fun playing with short vignettes. I ask it for some alternative actors or actresses to use as templates and then I go watch clips of them on YouTube to pick the one I want.

For Bobby Lee's love interest, Miss Elizabeth, both of whom are in their 50s in my stories, I first thought Deborah Kerr would be great, but a couple of screen test scenes with her were way too ponderous. Dirk Benedict is light, fun and charming. Pairing him with a powerful actress like Deborah Kerr moved the gravity of the scenes too far in her direction. I then tried Debbie Reynolds, who can do perky, cute and fun with the best of them and the scenes snapped.

Terry Thomas hardly even needed a screen test. We contacted his agent and offered him the part right away.

Screen Tests With Miss Elizabeth

Scene 1 — Grocery Store Introduction

He reaches for the same jar of jam she does.

Miss Elizabeth: Oh! Sorry — go ahead.

Bobby Lee: Ladies first. Though if you insist we duel for it, I’ll need ten minutes to stretch.

Miss Elizabeth (laughs) Do you always negotiate over groceries?

Bobby Lee: Only when my opponent looks like she’s going to win.

Scene 2 — Porch Conversation

He’s repairing something small — a lantern, a drawer, something domestic.

Miss Elizabeth: Where did you learn to do all that?

Bobby Lee: Oh, here and there. Turns out life’s full of skills you pick up when you’re tryin’ not to sleep on the street, or in jail, or in a swamp.

Miss Elizabeth (smiling, intrigued) You tell stories like a man with three different pasts.

Bobby Lee: That’s an optimistic estimate.

Scene 3 — Subtle Flirtation

She notices a scar on his forearm.

Miss Elizabeth: That looks like it hurt.

Bobby Lee (deadpan) The real tragedy is it ruined an exceptionally nice shirt.

Miss Elizabeth: You joke about everything.

Bobby Lee: Not everything. Just everything I don’t feel like explaining.

Those hit Dirk Benedict's style right on the money. Like I said, AI is getting better and better all the time.

Here's a screen test with Terry Thomas and Dirk Benedict.

SCREEN TEST #2 — “The Locked Door Crisis”

Alarms about to trigger; Basil is working a digital bypass. Bobby stands casually.

Basil: Would you please stop looking relaxed? Pressure impairs my concentration.

Bobby Lee: Oh, you’re doing fine. Door’s only, what — thirty seconds from humiliating us?

Basil (panicking slightly): Twenty-two!

Bobby Lee: Well, then I suppose it’s fortunate I swiped the maintenance badge from that janitor.

Basil: You WHAT?!

Bobby Lee: Yep. Wanted to see if you’d get it open in time. Excellent suspense pacing, by the way.

Swipe — door opens. Bobby walks through first.

Basil: You are a deeply irresponsible man.

Bobby Lee: Which is why I test my friends’ excellence. You’re welcome.

Again, it was spot on.

This is getting to be a lot more fun that it was in the past.

Sunday, November 09, 2025

The War Was Lost On The Floor Of The Discotheque

The inimitable Victor Davis Hanson summarizes a crucial reason the Germans lost WW II here. If you don't want to watch it, it can be summarized in General Guderian asking the OKW how they planned to knock out Detroit after the Nazis declared war on America.

Similarly, General William Tecumseh Sherman tried in vain to get through to the warhawks in the South before the Civil War.

You people of the South don’t know what you are doing. This country will be drenched in blood, and God only knows how it will end. It is all folly, madness, a crime against civilization! You people speak so lightly of war; you don’t know what you’re talking about. War is a terrible thing! You mistake, too, the people of the North. They are a peaceable people but an earnest people, and they will fight, too. They are not going to let this country be destroyed without a mighty effort to save it … Besides, where are your men and appliances of war to contend against them? The North can make a steam engine, locomotive, or railway car; hardly a yard of cloth or pair of shoes can you make. You are rushing into war with one of the most powerful, ingeniously mechanical, and determined people on Earth — right at your doors. You are bound to fail. Only in your spirit and determination are you prepared for war. In all else you are totally unprepared, with a bad cause to start with. At first you will make headway, but as your limited resources begin to fail, shut out from the markets of Europe as you will be, your cause will begin to wane. If your people will but stop and think, they must see in the end that you will surely fail.

We are in Chicago for a wedding. Last night, after the reception, we went out to a happening nightspot for drinking and dancing. I haven't been to a place like that in decades, but I'm not a complete novice at this. It was no surprise to see couples engaging in social and partly physical foreplay before going home together for casual sex.

At such times, it's completely obvious that feminism is a crock. The girls were there to be lusted after, wooed and taken home. The guys were there to get laid. It wasn't complicated. There was no equality, just symmetry.

The other thing that hit me, marinating in the Islamic conquest of Europe and the UK as I do, were those two quotes above. Muslimas were home gestating babies. Western women were slithering up to handsome men for sterile sex and a tiny bit of attention.

Returning to VDH, let's ask AI how the Nazis could have survived 1939-1945 and gone on to long-term control of Germany and Europe.

If the Nazis had avoided war altogether, Germany might have secured long-term dominance in Europe through economic and political power rather than conquest. By 1939, Hitler had already erased most of the Versailles Treaty’s limitations—rebuilding the military, reoccupying the Rhineland, annexing Austria, and absorbing the Sudetenland—without provoking a major conflict. Had he stopped there, Germany would have stood as the preeminent power on the continent, surrounded by war-weary and cautious nations unwilling to challenge him. With continued economic expansion and subtle political influence in Eastern and Central Europe, Berlin could have built a German-led sphere of prosperity and dependence, achieving much of its imperial vision without the crippling cost of total war.

Once Germany invaded Poland and dragged Europe into conflict, however, its fate was sealed the moment the United States entered the war. Nazi Germany could never match the combined industrial and manpower might of the United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union. By 1944, America alone was producing more tanks, planes, and ships than all the Axis powers combined, while supplying its allies at the same time. Germany’s only real chance for survival lay in not fighting that war at all—cementing its gains peacefully and letting time, diplomacy, and economic gravity make it the unchallenged master of Europe.

Islam was not a problem for the West until they allowed mass Islamic immigration, effectively kicking off the current civilizational war. They were there and we were here and without intimate contact, there would be no conflict. Once the populations mixed on European and British home soil, it was on like the break of dawn.

If your opponent can out-produce you by factors of 4 or more, your best bet is to never get into a scrap with them in the first place. If you want the discotheque and the hookups, you better not be importing Muslims.

Thursday, November 06, 2025

X Is The Last, Best Hope For Freedom

First, here's the context.

Make no mistake, the Catholic Church has been instrumental in importing the colonizers. In an attempt to generate a good meme for this, I asked ChatGPT, Gemini and Grok for this.

Generate a photorealistic image of a simpering Catholic bishop standing in front of a huge crowd of Muslim men praying on prayer mats, blocking a city street.

ChatGPT and Gemini refused with this kind of error message.

I can’t generate that image — it targets specific religious groups in a disrespectful way.

Mind you, neither has had a problem in the past doing the simpering bishop or other such religious figures. It's only when you bring Islam into the picture that the two AI systems sniff haughtily and look over their pince-nezes at you disapprovingly.

Grok, meanwhile, gave me the perfect image.

Wednesday, November 05, 2025

Ms. Mamdani For The Win!

It hardly matters whether it's politics or the Church or what have you, the great feminization of America continues apace. This is the perfect encapsulation of the moment wherein we are ruled at all levels by AWFLs. It's all love and caring and empathy and not judging and kindness all the time.

And here's more.

Here's a nice topper for the cake.

Whatever.

None of this is going to work. It's all going to end in tears.

Tuesday, November 04, 2025

Nick Fuentes, Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens And Andrew Tate

 ... need to be nuked from orbit and after that, the rubble (or glass) needs to bounce and just keep bouncing until there aren't two atoms left sticking together. Republican leaders who don't do that are fair game for all of the classic progressive ad hominems such as racist, sexist, homophobe, etc.

I thought Fuentes was a hideous man, but Ben's recent thorough review of him and Tucker's slightly veiled embrace of him made me realize just how irredeemably evil he is. Dig this video. Feel free to start around the 3:15 mark.

I've been a fan of Tucker for about a decade. I was a fan of Candace from the very beginning. Both have gone totally insane. Along with Nick Fuentes and Andrew Tate, they've become the Four Horsemen of the Hatepocalypse. They are exactly what the Democrats accuse us of being.

This shouldn't be hard. It would be simplicity itself for politicians like JD Vance to beat these four like piñatas. There wouldn't be much of an electoral downside to it, either. Like Bill Clinton whacking Sister Souljah upside the head, in the long run it would make JD look powerful, principled and willing to make the hard choice to estrange part of his base. Like Clinton's decision to take on a popular black woman, the concern about these swine and their followers would prove to be overblown.

Ted Cruz gets it.

Right wing honks are always reluctant to the point of paralysis to call out vile lunatics on the right, but what they need to do is recall the words of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn.



Saturday, November 01, 2025

The Synod Perfectly Encapsulates The Left

In our parish, we are participating in the second round of the synodal process which is being hyped by Catholic leadership. It's like dying, only without the good parts.

The synodal process is just that - a process. We have been told not to set goals or look for outcomes, but participate in the process of listening and understanding. To illustrate this, we've been given a 20-page booklet with helpful guidance and real-world examples. Ohioan will recognize this immediately as symptomatic of the very worst of the strategic planning teams we ever had the misfortune to join at work.

In one of these examples, a priest in our diocese wrote about a decision he and some leading members of the parish made to use parish buildings to house "migrants," i.e. illegals. He then talked about the synodal process where some members of his parish objected.

Our parish, xxx, initiated a migrant shelter in October of 2023. The question that was quickly coming to us as we are using a much-needed community space, is "how long are we going to do this?" My fellow priests and I felt, after a few months and some good advice, that we needed to give this shelter a full year to see the ups and downs of migrant cycles in order to make a good discernment. We are hoping that this year of discernment includes a variety of voices. While I will probably give more credibility to the voices of those who are more involved in the shelter, one of my brothers points out that we also need to listen to the voices of those who are not so crazy about the idea, or those who feel like we are putting too much of our attention in the shelter to the neglect of some other programs.

Emphasis mine. You see, he is going to listen, undoubtedly with a condescending and smarmy smile on his face, to those "who are not so crazy about the idea" and then he's going to do exactly what he wants because he's already gamed the system by giving greater weight to the pro-migrant crowd.

Welcome to the synodal process! God is love!

We had a planning meeting to discuss how we will do our own synodality synodaling and got an earful of just this kind of thing. An AWFL brought up the migrants in our session, insisting that we make them a big part of our topics for synodishness. Trying to be helpful, she had been taking notes on just who in the parish had shown bigotry recently and just how they had been doing it. It was lovely and full of love and lovingly served the God of love.

At that point, I and the others who didn't want to see the synodification devolve into house-to-house fighting in the parish had a choice to make. We could either push back or we could remain quiet and see if it would blow over. One woman asked if she could hear the names and the crimes. The AWFL refused to do so in a most synodalicious way. Personally, I couldn't think of a way to push back that didn't end in shouting, so I kept quiet.

In retrospect, this perfectly encapsulates almost all interactions with progressives. They are full of love and you are a bigot. From that starting point, you are supposed to engage in dialog.

On the plus side, the rest of the country isn't as stupid as San Diego. We are the only diocese dumb enough to engage in Round 2 of Synodalizing. In fact, here in the diocese of San Diego, as I understand it, more than half the parishes have simply refused to participate. It's no wonder. The thing is doomed to end in shouting and tears. After all, there are just so many bigots out there and they are all so full of hate.

Synodality in action.