On Ordered Relationships

In the last two blog posts, I've argued that it's a mistake to look at nutjobs who go for leather dog costumes and guys swimming on girls' teams from the individual's point of view. Instead, I suggested that we look at it from a societal point of view.

Once we ditched the idea that there is an objectively correct, ordered relationship between men and women, complete with expectations, roles and behaviors, all fetishes were destined to become acceptable... 

The problem with the LGBTQWERTY normalization is not the individual fetishists or even their possible victims. Heck, most of them don't have victims at all. No, the problem is what has happened to the sexual health of society. We aren't forming families through marriage and we're not having children. Women are experiencing increases in anxiety and depression. Those are clear signs of a society in distress.

But is there an objectively correct, ordered relationship between men and women in the first place?

Physics is knowable and objective because it describes a physical world that is ordered. That is, sub-atomic particles, atoms and molecules behave in fixed ways and have fixed constraints. That same physics, plus chemistry and biology, govern our lives as well. Put on all the leather dog costumes you want, it's not going to change the equations that describe your endocrine system or the chemical changes that happen as a result of sex. It doesn't matter if you're alone in a hotel room or writhing in a big pile of lubed-up CNN producers, your body's chemical fuels required for sex are finite. Further, they are replaced at fixed rates.

The presence or absence of those fuels change the way you interact with the world. Men and women behave differently depending on their current hormone levels. That means it matters how you spend them.

Take the example of OnlyFans. OnlyFans is Uber for porn. It allows individuals, typically attractive young women, to record porn and then post it for viewing by subscribers. The girls get paid and the guys get off. When the guys get off, they're changing their body chemistry which, in turn, changes the way they will interact with real girls the rest of the day.

Asking a girl out on a date requires courage. Getting accepted requires the guy to have some amount of competence, ambition and personal hygiene. Consuming OnlyFans requires none of that.

Let's say some chick's OnlyFans account has 10,000 very active subscribers. In effect, she has taken those 10,000 guys off the market. Because of that, there are 10,000 girls out there who won't be asked out on a date. The OnlyFans chick doesn't look like she's directly hurting anyone else, but, in fact, she is. No dates means no boyfriends. No boyfriends means no marriages. No marriages mean any babies that might come to these girls will be born out of wedlock. Bad stuff, that.

All I've used to get to this conclusion are the basic sciences of physics, chemistry and biology. No references to JP II's Theology of the Body were required. More on that in later posts.

BOOM.
"I'll just leave this little pamphlet here. You may read it at your leisure ..."