There's so much to unpack here. I don't have the time to work it into a cohesive essay, so let's just go with a numbered list. This is so fundamentally flawed that I'm sure I'm missing plenty, so feel free to add your own thoughts in the comments.Again, swap in "Jews" for everything Trump and Co says about refugees, Muslims and immigrants it's immediately clear what they're doing.— Christopher Hayes (@chrislhayes) September 20, 2016
- First off, he's comparing Trump to Hitler. A big government, strong man racist, Trump's got a lot going for him. However, Hillary has all that as well as does the entire Democratic Party, so I'm not sure where calling someone a Nazi is going to lead other than all of us donning our brown shirts and marching around. On the other hand, Hitler was more race-positive than race-negative and none of our current political figures are that. That is, Hitler was obsessed with the German race. His hatred was for those who obstructed der volk, not the sort of pandering racism of Trump and the Democrats. The analogy doesn't work at its most basic level.
- Violence all around the world is driven almost entirely by Muslims and almost not at all by Jews. I can't remember the last time there was internecine Jewish conflict like what's going on in Syria. The thought of it is ludicrous. Comparing Jews and Muslims is just silly.
- Did Chris think to ask any real Muslims what they thought of being compared to Jews, the sons of pigs and apes? It's in the Suras, for crying out loud.
- Did Chris think to ask any real Jews what they thought of being compared to Muslims? Maybe he could have interviewed some refugees from Islamic anti-Semitism as they fled parts of Europe.
The last two are the strangest for me and they illustrate the utter vacuum at the heart of open-minded, tolerant multiculturalism. Chris sees everyone as blobs of clay which just happen to be different colors. Sure, they are different colors, but they're still clay. Pieces of clay can be mashed together with ease. You might change the color of the blob, but it's still clay. To Chris, there is nothing distinct about any of them. They're just tokens in his political game, like pieces on a Risk board.
Equating Jews and Muslims has to be the ultimate in cultural ignorance. It's inconceivable that anyone with any kind of appreciation for the two cultures would do this. When you stop and think about it, multiculturalism isn't multi-cultural at all, it's unicultural. There are no meaningful differences between philosophies, religions, ethnicities or nationalities, there is only humanity, governed by whatever it is Chris and his buddies come up with today*. The rest of us are just blobs of clay.
Ironically, he's practicing what my faith, Catholicism, teaches. We are all made in the image of God and God loves us all equally so we should love each other. The difference is that I am required to respect you and how you're different. I am supposed to work to understand your point of view and appreciate it. He doesn't even know that you have a point of view.
* - Today, it's cisgenderism.
7 comments:
This pussified lightweight is a child of Chicago nepotism. His father in law is a celeberated ABC 7 nit wit and now head of the BGA - Andy Shaw. Andy got Chris his gigs. Here's Andy doing what he did best!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0hV8lCcB_E
"Chris Hayes Gives Us The Strangest Tweet Of The Week"
In this challenging competition, he scores own goal -- "We're also very lucky that the attackers tried to use explosives rather than guns"
"This pussified lightweight ..."
Be nice, now. He's the female Rachel Maddow.
Let's not forget that the Jews were being targeted for genocide. Like the Christians and Yazidis are today B the Moslems. And they are the ones GROSSLY underrepresented among the "migrants"/refugees being allowed in. So underrepresented that they are being purposely EXCLUDED.
What? Hitler simply wanted to keep illegal Jews out of Germany?
Anon, I'm with you. It's hard to find someone more at risk than the Jews. That Chris can't differentiate them from anyone else just shows how he can't tell anyone apart no matter how different they are.
Ilion, I thought I botched that one. How about this: Hitler thought that blacks were inferior, too, but since he didn't have a fantasy about them oppressing Germans, his attitude towards them was merely superior rather than genocidal. It was all about the Germans. At least that's what I've gathered from reading Mein Kampf
Does that make sense?
^ No, I was making a comment on Hayes's insane assertion.
Post a Comment