The Pope recently visited Lampedusa, an Italian island near the coast of North Africa, recently famous for being the initial landing point for African and Muslim men invading Europe. The Pope refers to them as "migrants," but while I am obligated to be obedient to his theological teachings when he speaks from the Deposit of the Faith, he is just another blue collar drunk at the bar when it comes to geopolitics and economics.
In this case, I had to say, "Shut up, Leo. You're full of it."
I'm referring, of course, to his standard blather about embracing the stranger or welcoming the stranger or letting my daughter get raped by strangers, all for Jesus. Whatever. It's all the same, man.
Just shut up, Leo.
I got involved in discussions on X about this and a defender of the Pope, presumably an AWFL, asked me to explain why I was so incensed about it. To me, it's the equivalent of the child abuse scandal that rocked the Church a few decades back where gay priests were raping altar boys. Now, it's their beloved "migrants" gang-raping white, European girls.
If you haven't read it, I highly recommend paging through this document. I'm not sure you'll be able to read it thoroughly. I couldn't. It's chock full of nauseating horror.
The Rape Gang Inquiry Report.https://t.co/EuKgGWBRhS pic.twitter.com/SD5G9HPVtV
— Rupert Lowe MP (@RupertLowe10) June 16, 2026
After years of blogging, I know that using anyone else's link risks the loss of data when that content gets deleted, so here is that same report hosted on my own Google Drive.
The Adoration Of Migrants Is A Perversion And A Fetish
First off, it brought to mind a recent meeting I had with our local bishop as a part of our parish staff connecting with him. The bishop is a full on virtue pervert when it comes to this, morally masturbating to the thought of embracing the stranger and uplifting the marginalized. Why do I use such repellent terms? I have 3 reasons.
First off, he and the other members of the USCCB and Catholic Charities aren't doing anything themselves.
They aren't embracing or uplifting anyone. Our grandchildren are doing all the heavy lifting. Biden's funding of the USCCB and Catholic Charities to the tune of $2.5B to assist in the invasion of America was the very definition of marginal costs. It wasn't being done before and there was no national demand for it. Every penny sent to the Catholic moral perverts who were getting off to the thought of helping the stranger came from borrowing. With this level of debt, none of those borrowed dollars will be paid for by our generation, it will all come from future generations.
It's a perversion of Christ's teaching. They have changed Matthew 19 into this:
Now someone approached him and said, “Teacher, what good must I do to gain eternal life?”
He answered him, “Why do you ask me about the good? There is only One who is good. If you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments.”
He asked him, “Which ones?”
And Jesus replied, “ ‘You shall not kill; you shall not commit adultery; you shall not steal; you shall not bear false witness; honor your father and your mother’; and ‘you shall love your neighbor as yourself.’”
The young man said to him, “All of these I have observed. What do I still lack?”
Jesus said to him, “If you wish to be perfect, go, take all the money the children have and give it to the government, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”
A perversion and a fetish aren't really horrible unless you know what you're doing.
There isn't an American alive capable of reading that doesn't know we're buried in debt.
Raping White Girls For Jesus
By now, there is no one active on social media, and this certainly includes all of the bishops, cardinals and the Pope and their staffs, who isn't aware of the mass gang-raping of white, British girls by Muslims in England. Further, national rape stats tell the same story. Dig how Poland's rape rate as gone down as they did not participate in the uplifting of the migrants.
Assuming that the Church was being run by well-meaning, but naive people in, say, 2010 and even 2020, they certainly aren't naive now. Every time the Pope or USCCB or EWTN posts masturbatory content from Lampedusa or the border or migrant detention centers, they get absolutely bodied in the replies and quotes, many times with stats like these.
They know. They all know.
It's not a perversion if you're innocently naive. They all know.
It's All So Very Synodal
Perhaps one of the most repellent aspects of this is the way our prelates go on and on and on and on about being "synodal." In the synodal process, we are called to listen, truly listen with open minds and humble hearts to each other. We are to accompany our neighbors in their life journeys.
Well, everyone except the bishops, the cardinals and the Pope, that is. They can swank about, preaching absolutely pornographic, virtue-signaling twaddle morning, noon and night. That's what the Pope's photo op on Lampedusa was. Porn for the AWFLs.
Pope Leo shook the hands of each of these 20 migrants who just arrived to Europe during his visit to Lampedusa on July 4th, reminding everyone that all human life carries immeasurable worth. A powerful moment of compassion at Europe’s doorstep. pic.twitter.com/Tk36O7HBS7
— EWTN News (@EWTNews) July 4, 2026
To me, that might be just as nauseating as Rupert Lowe's Rape Gang Report. Meanwhile, here's one of the replies that our synodal leadership synodally ignored.
Not far from the Vatican there is a cemetery where a young girl called Desirée Mariottini is buried.
— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) July 6, 2026
Desirée was a 16-year-old girl who was drugged and raped over two days until her death by a gang of Senegalese and Nigerians migrants in a “drug den” in the San Lorenzo district… pic.twitter.com/jQpPBQM5HW
Learning From Our Mistakes Requires Admitting Mistakes
A decade ago, when one of the Queens of the AWFLs, Angela Merkel, kicked off the whole migrant jerk-off frenzy, one might have been charitable and given the Church the benefit of the doubt. You simply cannot do that any more. There's no excuse for this.
I think that's what makes me absolutely incandescent about the whole migrant fetishization. They know better and they don't care. The onanistic pleasure of signaling their virtue within their social group overwhelms their compassion for the victims of this invasion.
I didn't realize it until that kindly AWFL on X pleasantly interrogated me and I was forced to break through my anger and get to a rational explanation of it.
In a way, we were being synodal there. Weird.
4 comments:
I assume that the reason you included the national debt clock in the post is because you think it is relevant to the immigration issue. So, what do you see as the effect of immigration on the national debt? If the Cato Institute is to be believed, immigrants actually reduce the national debt, not increase it:
https://www.cato.org/white-paper/immigrants-recent-effects-government-budgets-1994-2023
Specifically, they say:
"For each year from 1994 to 2023, the US immigrant population generated more in taxes than they received in benefits from all levels of government.
Over that period, immigrants created a cumulative fiscal surplus of $14.5 trillion in real 2024 US dollars, including $3.9 trillion in savings on interest on the debt."
"Without immigrants, US government public debt at all levels would be at least 205 percent of gross domestic product (GDP)—nearly twice its 2023 level."
Do you have a refutation of that?
"If the Cato Institute is to be believed, immigrants actually reduce the national debt, not increase it."
Tim, this is not meant to be a dig at you, but to illustrate the stupidity of the libertarian claim.
If the Cato Institute is to believed, then it should be easy to do this calculation: How many migrants do we need to let into the country to balance the budget?
More thoughts. When talking to Libertarians, I always feel like I'm speaking with a precocious, young inventor who is absolutely convinced they've finally invented the perfect perpetual motion machine. They have a document showing how it works, but they haven't built one. Yet. That will come soon.
In this case, the Biden Administration opened the border to millions upon millions of migrants. What language did they speak? All of them! Well, each spoke one language, their own, but it was a broad mix from around the world.
Getting back to your request for refutation, imagine being the mayor of a small town in Indiana and having 200 migrants show up. Even if they worked plucking chickens and made the local processing plant owner money, there was simply no way the town's infrastructure could hope to support them. How many teachers did you need for whatever kids speaking whatever language, with minimal literacy skills, that came with the pack? How about your local DMV? The police? Can you read them their rights in Urdu, please, Officer Mulvaney?
I'm sure you can flesh this out much more yourself. You actually don't have to because all of this really happened, thousands of times over and got recorded, if suppressed, online.
Just off the top of my head, how much money did the ones they stuffed into O'Hare Airport generate? Remember those people? Wild.
The flip side of this, though, is what I actually see up here. The millions of unskilled, non-english-speaking migrants that you talk about never come anywhere close to here. The immigrants that I meet are students coming to the US to study engineering. They are generally bright, motivated people who, if they manage to stay in the US, become productive citizens. And I watch them wade through masses of paperwork, jump through ridiculous hoops, have to thread through narrow restrictions on what work they can and cannot do, and generally deal with a hostile immigrations bureaucracy that treats them as if they are likely to be rapist drug dealers or something. It appears to me as if the government is having difficulty finding the immigrants who are actually problematic, and so they take out their frustruations on the immigrants who are playing by the rules and coming in legitimately.
Post a Comment