Thursday, July 17, 2025

This Isn't Going To Be Like "The Troubles"

This is going to be an existential fight to the death, brought on us by the faculty lounge and their idiot idea of multiculturalism. In Ireland, it was the Catholics vs. Protestants, fueled by a political power struggle. At their core, both sides had nearly identical belief systems. This sort of thing would have been out of the question.

Attempted Islamic honor killing: Two fundamentalist Muslim migrants from Iraq are on trial in Olympia, Wash. over a horrific attack on their teen daughter outside Timberline High School last year. Prosecutors say Ihsan Ali and Zahraa Ali strangled the girl to try to kill her as revenge for her rejecting their plan to marry her off to an older Muslim man in their home country. 

The girl's parents disapproved of her living an American lifestyle and having an American boyfriend. They allegedly hunted her down after she ran away the day she was supposed to fly to Iraq. Neither of the parents speaks English, and both are being provided with an Arabic translator at trial.

Watch the harrowing surveillance video showing brave school boys fighting the dad to try to save the girl as she was being choked out. The girl was able to break free after multiple people intervened. The mother allegedly grabbed the girl by the neck when she tried to run for her life.

The fundamental problem with multiculturalism, the one we're living out in real time right now, is that some cultures are simply incompatible with each other. The faculty lounge didn't actually understand the cultures they wanted to import, they were blinkered by their hatred of European colonialism. The truly ironic thing is that European colonialism pales in comparison to Islamic colonialism. While the European empires are all dead and gone, the Islamic empire is growing like kudzu.

The faculty lounge still can't see it. This is how you end up with Euro leaders still importing Africans and Muslims by the boatload and Reuters blaming the unrest in Spain on the far-right and neo-fascists, whatever that means.

Meanwhile, British comedians are getting even cheekier. It's sort of a gallows cheek now.

By the way, some stats show that the Afghanis are actually at the top of the Leader Board when it comes to rape in Europe. That's not surprising considering the experiences of our troops in that benighted country.

It's good to see Eritrea waving the African flag here. I have to say, I'm disappointed in the Congolese. Talk about overhyped! The Congo is supposed to be the rape capital of the world. Come on, guys, those are rookie numbers. Get them up! Err, that works both ways, doesn't it? No worries, all cultures are equal, right faculty loungers?

The solution is simple. Don't record the ethnicity of the rapists. Problem solved!

OK, that was cheap. The real solution is to lower the voting age to 16.

Err, isn't the "migrant" population heavily weighted on the young end?

Shh! It's racist to think that way. Diversity is our strength. All cultures are equal. Practice, as my ex-bishop liked to say, Radical Inclusion!

Going back to the main thesis of my post, there is no way these cultures can live together. Over time, one will have to dominate the others. Traditional Christianity, far back in last place, could tolerate the Secular Left and its fixation on sexual degeneracy and death, think abortion and euthanasia, but neither of them can live long with either Islamic intolerance or African violence and squalor.

If you are still in the UK and not actively looking for a new home in America, you have rocks in your head.

Special Bonus Material

Get out, get out, get out.

Wednesday, July 16, 2025

Torre Pacheco?

Dig this.

I myself had wondered if all the predictions of civil war in England were hyperbolic, but more and more I'm seeing incidents like this one.

In Torre Pacheco, Spain, which is 30% migrant, a group of Africans beat up an old man out for a morning walk. The local Spanish lads didn't take too kindly to that and went out for revenge. That got the other Africans riled up and they took to the streets themselves. Given that the population of this Spanish burg of 30,000 is 30% African and that most "migrants" are military-age men, the odds probably favor the Africans when it comes to street fighting.

The authorities and their mouthpieces in the legacy media, like Reuters, blamed the violence on the far-right and neo-fascists. That might deter some Boomers from joining in the fun, but the odds that Gen Z Spanish rowdies will even know Reuters called them names is minimal. It certainly won't stop them from whacking a few migrants.

As the Aussie TV broadcast suggested, this has spread to other parts of Spain and the rest of Europe as well. A newly-constructed Mosque in Spain seemed to experience some electrical problems and caught fire. It could also have been a gasoline and matches problem, you never know.

England Leads The Way

Always the ones to come up with clever solutions, the British government has been importing military age Afghan men whose identities as collaborators was revealed in a data breach. Not to worry, by the time the whole thing is done, another 100,000 or more Afghanis will end up in England. Afghanis being near the top of the Rape Standings, things may get even more dicey than they already are for the British roses.

Oh, did I forget to mention that this whole import-the-rapey-Afghani thing was kept hush-hush?

Yay?

France Surrenders To Hamas

This is unreal.

France’s top asylum court has ruled that all Palestinians living in Gaza are now eligible to apply for full refugee status, overturning a previous decision.

These people are insane. Europe is self-destructing.

Super Special Bonus Content

In Poland, they take a bit dimmer view of the invaders, particularly when the invaders are video recording their children. The Polish government is less likely than the others to frown upon their young men.

Saturday, July 12, 2025

New Puppy, No Sleep, No Energy, No Blogging

 Meet Buddy!

Wife kitteh wanted a younger dog that she can take for walks so she gets more exercise. Lily and Leah, our chihuahua-mixes, are roughly 70 years old in human years. Walking? No. How about going back to bed after a snack?

Buddy is 11 weeks old and we were told he was a spaniel-lab mix. If that dog has any spaniel in him, I'm the King of France. He looks more like a pit bull to me. Still, his paws aren't that big, so whatever he is, I can't see him getting over 40#.

I hope.

In the meantime, while the girls sleep with us as they always have, Buddy sleeps in a crate downstairs. Well, that is until he wakes up and doesn't want to be in the crate. This morning, that happened at 0230. Bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark...

I finally got up and jumped on that particular canine grenade at 0245. Oof.

I can't wait for him to get a bit older so he's had all his shots and we can safely take him to the local dog park to get his ya-yas out.

Until then, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Sunday, July 06, 2025

Thinking 5 Minutes Into The Future

 ... is where the British authorities are right now.

I know this is my own post, but while I was able to download the video and post it myself on X, I was not able to embed the original post with it for some unknown reason.

As illegal immigration in the form of military-age African and Muslim men continues apace, roughly 1500 per day across the Channel, the authorities are wetting themselves in fear of ethnic unrest. Because they cannot bring themselves to violate the Euro laws on granting asylum to "refugees," they are guaranteeing racial unrest in the future and only making it worse when it comes. As the folks in the video below say, Britain is probably already past the tipping point.

The failure of progressive theology - diversity is our strength - is patently obvious now, but the solution - ethnic repatriation - is impossible without the one thing the authorities fear the most, ethnic unrest.

The Balkan Model

After the collapse of tyranny in Yugoslavia, the Balkans fell into just this kind of racial fighting. The place was wrecked, tens of thousands died and the country split apart along racial homeland lines.

Britain won't be so fortunate, if fortunate is the right word. There are no racial homeland lines in England because the progressives imported and then scattered the combatants. It won't be enough to have a limited conflict which results in the Africans getting Cornwall, the Muslims getting London and the southeast and the British getting the rest. In England, the migrants own the cities and the British own the countryside.

This is going to be much more like Lebanon in the 1970s than the Balkans in the 1990s.

Finally, since the British are probably less aggressive and willing to take losses than the Muslims who are promised paradise if they die in Jihad, it is far more likely that once the fighting breaks out, those British who can escape for America or elsewhere will do so.

Exit Question

Who will the authorities back if it comes to violence? To date, all of the evidence points to them supporting anyone but the British.

Super Special Bonus Graphic

Tuesday, July 01, 2025

Trapped In A Fantasy

This is an absolutely fantastic essay describing the mix of delusions and European laws that have trapped the British government into inactivity in the face of African and Muslim invasion.

Inside the intelligence services, special forces (themselves under attack from the Cabinet Office and NI Office as they operate as our last line of defence, see below), bits of Whitehall, and those most connected to discussions away from Westminster, there is growing, though still tiny, discussion of Britain’s slide into chaos and the potential for serious violence including what would look like racial/ethnic mob/gang violence, though the regime would obviously try to describe it differently. Part of the reason for the incoherent forcefulness against the white rioters last year from a regime that is in deep-surrender-mode against pro-Holocaust marchers, rape gangs and criminals generally, is a mix of a) aesthetic revulsion in SW1 at the Brexit-voting white north and b) incoherent Whitehall terror of widespread white-English mobs turning political and attracting talented political entrepreneurs. They’re already privately quaking about the growth of Muslim networks. The last thing they want to see is emerging networks that see themselves as both political and driven to consider violence. Parts of the system increasingly fear this could spin out of control into their worst nightmare. In No10 meetings with the Met on riots, I saw for myself a) the weird psychological zone of how much order rests not on actual physical forces but perceptions among a few elites about such forces that can very quickly change, and b) how scared the senior police are at the prospect of crucial psychological spells being broken. We can see on the streets that various forces have already realised the regime will not stop them. What if this spreads? Whitehall’s pathology has pushed it to the brink of this psychological barrier and many of them know it.

Italics in the original. It is written by a fellow with a lot of experience within the highest circles of the British government and with personal knowledge of the meetings that have taken place over the years.

I've been wondering how to approach this blog post and keep coming up against the sheer magnitude of the task so here I will provide come ideas that give you an idea of the trap the British elites have sprung on themselves. I've been discussing this with AI and we came up with this decent summary of the situation.

1. Collapse of Order and Growing Threat of Violence

  • Britain's institutions are crumbling and chaos is spreading.
  • Intelligence services and parts of the military fear an outbreak of serious violence, including racially charged gang warfare.
  • The government’s uneven handling of unrest—harsh on white rioters, lenient on Islamist extremists—is driven by aesthetic class bias and fear of political awakening among white English networks.

2. Dysfunction of the Political and Administrative Elite

  • Whitehall and Westminster (SW1) are in denial, trapped in emotional decision-making.
  • No10 (Prime Minister's office) has become incapable of executing strategic policy due to bureaucratic power capture by the Cabinet Office and National Security Secretariat (NSS), which is opaque and unaccountable.

3. Immigration, Lawfare, and Incompetence

  • The regime has encouraged uncontrolled immigration, favoring the unskilled from volatile regions while punishing skilled migrants.
  • The Human Rights Act (HRA) and European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) have tied the hands of the government and military.
  • Legal constraints prevent stopping small boat crossings from France, despite military and legal consensus that it is operationally simple.

4. Media and Elite Delusion

  • The media are complicit, suppressing information and spinning narratives to hide the realities of immigration and legal absurdities.
  • Political leadership is marked by “superposition personalities”—leaders caught between self-deception and dishonesty.
  • The public is enraged and disillusioned by elite hypocrisy and policy failures.

Emphasis mine. This will provide a backgrounder for future posts.

The things to note is that the European Union's ECHR is still being allowed to govern Britain's approach towards the daily amphibious assaults on their coasts. Over 1000 illegals are arriving every day by small boat. The Royal Navy could stop this immediately, but the British leadership won't take that action because it violates the ECHR.

The people voted for BREXIT, but the elites can't bring themselves to take the next step and simply ignore the ECHR. All the while, their country is being overrun by Africans and Muslims. It's slow-motion, suicidal madness.

British universities are no less anti-white than our own, obsessing over decolonialization and the moral primacy of the "marginalized." The elites in Britain are shot through with this sadomasochistic lunacy.

Meanwhile ...

Saturday, June 28, 2025

On Battle Damage Assessments In Iran

I've seen all the kerfuffle around our bombing of the Iranian nuke sites and people waving their arms and shouting that we didn't do all that much damage. I find that almost impossible to believe.

The combined intel capabilities of Israel and America are unmatched in the world. The Israelis have Mossad agents on the ground in Iran and our SIGINT and satellite intel are terrific. I'd bet a large stack of money that there were UAVs floating around over all of the target sites as well. 

Israel has an existential interest in making sure the Iranian nuke effort was wiped out. The attacks on Iran were a one-off. Israel isn't going to be given permanent carte blanche to bomb Iran.

Further, Iran was flat on its back. It couldn't defend itself at all. There was no reason we couldn't have sent the B-2s back several more times and let Israel smack Iran around for another week. We had a pair of carriers in the area who never got off a single air strike.

In order for me to believe that we didn't obliterate Iran's nuke facilities, you'd have to convince me that the Israeli and US intel operations whiffed on their damage assessments after the strikes. There is no way Israel would have called off its attacks or even moved to secondary and tertiary targets, like they did near the end, if they had thought Iran still possessed a significant portion of its uranium enrichment capabilities.

I don't care what a handful of leakers tell the press, I simply don't believe it. I mean, it's possible that the Iranians outfoxed us all, but that seems to be the longest of longshots.

Fordow is gone, man, solid gone.

Friday, June 27, 2025

When You Come To A Fork In The Road, Take It, But First, Run Over Andrew Cuomo

 OK, I admit, that's a long blog post title. Still, it works.

Cuomo lost the Democratic primary for mayor of NYC to a Marxist Muslim with absolutely zero management experience. Cuomo, former governor of NY, should have turned Mamdani into roadkill, if resumes counted for anything.

But resumes don't count for anything when there's a major fork in the road and your candidacy represents going straight, right into a tree.

IMO, these days, every election has as one of its dominant issues this question: Should the government get much larger or much smaller? Where we are right now is untenable. We are not, as Jefferson Davis wanted to do for the slaves, taking care of people from cradle to grave. We are also not, as Thomas Sowell might argue, allowing people to make their own choices and live with the consequences.

We have found the middle point - trying to do a whole lot for citizens while running up a crushing debt because we won't tax those same citizens appropriately. That's a middle point that, quite obviously, is unstable.

NYC, California, Los Angeles, Seattle, Portland, Baltimore, Chicago, insert your favorite blue state or blue city here, have balance sheets that look a lot like this.

No one, outside of innumerate white, liberal women, thinks this is sustainable. We either need to do the full Mamdani / Davis and turn everyone into proles / slaves or we need to start moving back towards Thomas Sowell. You can't just stand in the middle of the road shouting, "Stay the course! Everything is fine! We just need competent leadership and all will be well."

Cuomo tried just that and the college-educated, read: college indoctrinated, deserted him and voted for Jeff Davis. It will always be like that. This is the future of the Democratic Party. You can't stay in the middle of the road and get run over like a possum, you're going to have to make a choice. The activists are plumping for slavery to Massa in the Big Statehouse. They've got the energy and enthusiasm.

If you're a centrist Democrat, you're going to have to argue that we need to take the other choice at the fork in the road.

Super Special Bonus Muppet Movie Content

No fork-in-the-road blog post would be complete without this.

Thursday, June 26, 2025

And Now New York

 Here are the freely elected mayors of Chicago and Los Angeles.

Brandon Johnson, Chicago.

Karen Bass, Los Angeles.

And now, the frontrunner for the mayor of New York City.

Zohran Mamdani, New York.

Well.

All of them have had strong support from white, college-educated voters. None of them are people you'd choose to run even a modest-sized business. Brandon is continually getting in hot water for his black supremacist statements. Karen Bass' incompetence led to a decent portion of her city burning down and the glacially-slow rebuild is precisely what you'd expect from, well, a Karen Bass administration.

While the other two are so incompetent that they don't even know they're incompetent, Mamdani is in a class by himself when it comes to inexperience and incompetence. As far as I can tell, he's never managed anything real. No businesses, no government entities, nothing. He does know how to run a modern campaign, though. Hats off to him for trouncing a well-funded opponent who was the very model of a politician from 2010.

Going back to the white, college-educated voters, seeing Chicago, LA and New York all in the grips of race-crazed socialists is about what you'd expect if you allowed the far left to take over your education industry. This is where Whiteness Studies, DEI and Marxist economics leads. The longer a person stays in school, the more indoctrination they get, so it's no surprise that the super-smart set plumped for idiots like these.

Wednesday, June 18, 2025

Boss Babe Fail Explained

 I thought this was exceptional. You may want to click on it and watch it on YouTube.

Monday, June 16, 2025

Push The Fertility Rope Harder

The New York Times, ever on the lookout for more revenue sources to feed the 14 PSI vacuum that is the government, has the answer to the fertility crisis that threatens the tax base.


Wonder of wonders, it calls for more government intervention. Just like the Nordic countries have.

Err, there's just one problem with that.

The Nordies don't know nuthin' 'bout birthin' no babies, Miss Scarlett.

This leads me back to the famous Thomas Sowell quote and my musings on sex, Sex, SEX!

The tradeoff in question is tradwife vs career boss-babe. We're not having babies because women are waiting too long to get married. You can either focus on education and career or you can find a man, get a ring and make with the horizontal monkey dance. Yes, you can do both, but the longer you wait, the fewer babies you will have.

If having babies is any kind of goal, and survival subtly hints that it should be, you can't be waiting until you are in your mid-30s to get down to business. It's not much more complicated than that.

The problem isn't a lack of government spending, it's that we are emphasizing career and education over family, consciously making that trade-off decision that we value women's agency and self-reliance more than we do babies.

You don't have to  make a moral judgment either way to see that this is what's happening.

Sunday, June 15, 2025

Jonah Goldberg's Theology At Work In England

The second video below, from Peter Boghossian, was interesting for about 5 minutes or so. It might have been interesting for longer than that, but I turned it off because it had so many problems.

First, however a preliminary video from Peter.

The fact that Peter can't understand why no Islamists wanted to come on his show is telling. Their goal is to turn Europe Muslim. Just what Peter has to contribute to that effort, I'm sure I don't know. They have absolutely nothing to gain by going on his blatherfest of a show.

Now the main show.

The question at hand is: will Europeans surrender to Islam? Lacking an Islamist to make the argument in favor, the conversation in both directions reminded me of Jonah Goldberg's defenses of religion.

I don't listen to Jonah any more, but back in the day, I recall him saying he wasn't a believer, but studies had shown that a culture with a strong faith tradition did 37% better in terms of dhsa ;fa  dcnwaf as.

OK, I fell asleep at that point, but he said something like that.

It was all as bloodless as only someone convinced he is an intellectual can make it. As I watched those 5 minutes of the group discussion about surrendering to Islam, it felt exactly like that. I thought about the argument I would have made on the pro-surrender side. I would have taken my best shot at being a devout Muslim for the sake of the discussion. Here's what I would have said after the case had been made for religion leading to more happiness and a better life like it was some kind of diet and exercise regimen.

When was the last time you prayed? When was the last time you went to temple or church? We pray every day. In fact, we have pulled out our prayer mats and deliberately stopped traffic in your streets to pray in the middle of your cities. Do you really think you're going to stand up to that kind of devout faith with a pile of sociology studies?

Your leaders hate you. They arrest you if you say anything against us or deface a Koran. They do this because your entire education system believes that you, your race and your culture are irredeemably evil. They all hate you and none of them will ever support you. They think that your culture would be improved by importing the Congolese. The Congolese! That tells you just how much they despise you. How are you going to stand up against us with leadership like that?

You're living in a surveillance state the tracks your movement, your communications and your social media posts. How do you plan on organizing any resistance to us when your authorities will stamp it out as soon as they see it? Your police arrest you for saying nasty things about Islam, but let us go when we rape your girls. Heck, we raped over 100,000 of them and your leaders and social workers and police and intellectuals didn't just sit and watch, they actively and intentionally aided and abetted the rapes!

At the younger demographics, you're already outnumbered in your large cities. In places like France, it's actually illegal to count how many of us there are because the authorities don't want you to know how bad things are. They hate you that much.

Finally, if push comes to shove, and with us, it always does, who among you is going to fight? We are willing to fight and die for Islam. We are raised to believe that Allah will reward us handsomely if we die spreading Islam. Our young men are driven to courageous and violent action by their devout faith. Meanwhile, you can't even remember the last time you muttered a quiet prayer.

It's not that you will surrender to us. It's that you already have.

Reply to that one, infidels.

Your leadership, your universities, your news media and your police all hate you. You might as well make it easy on yourselves and surrender now.

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

Take This Simple Deportation Test!

 ... it only has two questions.

  1. Are you here illegally?
  2. Are you fluent in English?

If your answer is Yes to 1 and No to 2, congratulations, you've won a free trip to the border!

That is not to say that if your answer to 2 is Yes you get to stay, but in the first round of deportations, this is a simple and valuable way to do what the government is morally bound to do - make the lives of American citizens better.

Here is the Great Schools link for Forest Park High School in Baltimore. It is majority black and majority illiterate. Its graduates can barely speak English. There is no chance they know any Spanish. If they want to chart a productive and happy life, they are going to need entry-level, no-skill opportunities in the labor market. Two primary career paths are construction and housekeeping. If those workforces communicate in Spanish, our black American young adults are doomed.

Those job sites will speak Spanish so long as the population they draw from speaks Spanish. The illegals come in with a wage advantage for employers, so they will dominate those workforces so long as they're here in this country.

The government has a moral duty to protect and care for American citizens. It has no duty to citizens of Honduras, Congo or Syria.

America and Americans first, baby.

More of this, please.

Tuesday, June 10, 2025

The Borders Of Los Angeles

 ... do not extend to the Rio Grande.

As the rioting and protesting continues in LA these days over ICE law enforcement efforts, there is something missing as we discuss them. We need to hear the opinions of the people of Montana.

The national border is just that: national. It isn't the Los Angeles border or the California border or the border of the people who live in the barrio. It's the border of the United States of America. Just because you live close to it or you are Hispanic, it doesn't mean your opinion should carry more weight than the opinions of Filipino-Americans living in Rhode Island or Scotch-Irish-Americans living in Mississippi.

In fact, we had a referendum on this very topic last November and we decided, as a nation, to evict as many illegals as we possibly could as fast as we possibly could. It doesn't get much simpler than that.

Los Angelinos don't think you get a say in border enforcement.

Monday, June 09, 2025

When Loyalty Oaths Conflict With Iconic Images

 ... you get a sense of the end times for the organization in question. Dig these two images.


Burning cars, rocks thrown at ICE vehicles, federal law enforcement officers being physically attacked and shops being looted equals "without incident" for the LAPD public affairs team. Like I said yesterday, that wasn't a press release as much as it was a loyalty oath. "See, boss? I'm on your side!"

This kind of thing happens in all organizations at all levels. It's human nature to try to stay on your superior's good side. When it happens while the organization is in steep decline, it has more than its normal air of decay. It's like the classic scene from Downfall where the Nazi toadies are still showing Hitler over-the-top deference even as the Soviets are closing in on the bunker.

The LA riots over the weekend weren't nearly as bad as that nor were they widespread across LA county. Still, they happened and people all over the country could see what was happening, almost live, from videos posted to X by citizen-journalists. To ignore them, as many Sunday news programs did, or to deny the violence as the LAPD did above, adds a strong flavor of surreal decadence to it.

It's not gaslighting if everyone knows that everyone else can see the truth right in front of their faces. It's something else.

It's a loyalty oath to a regime visibly unraveling.

Sunday, June 08, 2025

On The Use Of Artillery In The Los Angeles ICE Riots

Here are some random reactions I had while sipping my morning coffee and scrolling through X, focusing on the far-left spasms of violence protesting the arrest of criminals by ICE. As I scrolled, the artillery aspect became paramount as it is the rioters primary weapon, the secondary, close-combat weapon being fire.

Let's do this.

First off, we have the question of projectile size, range and the sustainment of fire.

Just guessing here, but it looks like those noodle-armed soyboys can throw 2# rocks about 100'. Many moons ago, I blew out my arm playing outfield for a softball team after not properly warming up ahead of time. I still remember the exact moment it happened. My shoulder hurts just watching these dorks throw.

How long will it take the riot police to close that 100 foot gap? How much damage will a 2# rock do with a soft ballistic trajectory against men in body armor and helmets?

Moving on, let's look at some close combat.


Nothing says "fighting for the marginalized" quite like pasty-faced radicals and Chicano thugs teaming up to attack a Hispanic's convenience store. It's their typical tactic of ganging up on a property owner who operates outside of law enforcement's protective perimeter. 

Here's some more close combat / looting.

The "resistance" isn't targeting ICE units or even things of interest to ICE. They are simply burning and looting businesses that matter to the authorities who support the resistance. Winning!

Before we move on to the authorities, dig the flags being waved. The Mexican flag is ubiquitous in these riots.

Imagine how this is playing outside of the blue zones. In fact, imagine how this is playing in the New York and Chicago neighborhoods where the black residents were enraged when their cities cut their social services to pay for the illegals.

Defensive perimeters have been set up by the rioters.

Defensive perimeter by PlaySkool!

Returning to the authorities, the LA and California blues are in full Baghdad Bob mode.

Why on Earth would anyone ever post this? It doesn't calm the situation and only shreds your credibility, lowering the morale of your combat units. It's baffling to me. The only explanation I can give is that this is the same thing that was done in the last days of the Ceausescu regime. It's not a news release, it's a loyalty oath.

Here are some more images from the event. See if you can spot the common feature.

Nothing helps out a deep blue politician's 2028 hopes quite like having your amigos wave Mexican flags as they attack law enforcement personnel.

Oh Gavin, sweetie, in those benighted states that are east of the I-15, sending in the Marines to deal with your Mexican-flag-waving rioters and restore order makes perfect sense. Watching these videos, no one cares or even understands the constitutional or legal nuances of how and when a president can use federal forces. If you want to have a shot at the Oval Office, you might want to start thinking about that.

There's lots more out there. Here are some excellent X accounts documenting the riots.

Andy Ngo

Anthony Cabassa

Cam Higby

Bonus Content

Here are some of the folks ICE was arresting when this all erupted.

Saturday, June 07, 2025

Platoon-Level Engagements In Sweden

This entire essay from Katie Hopkins on the state of womanhood in Sweden is a must-read. For the purposes of this blog post, here are the relevant excerpts.

Swedish women reaching out by email, by letter, to quietly show me what has become of their country.

Dads writing that they were worried for their daughters, tweeting that Sweden is not the place people imagine it to be, that young girls are scared to go out at night.

A news feed filled with reports of the rape and assault of Sweden’s young women, some inexplicably streamed live on Facebook by the gang as they attacked...

One young girl of 27 — let's call her Lucy— is now terrified of going out alone. She lives near a busy shopping centre which draws migrants from no-go zones, and dreads her walk to work and home.

Under the bridge near her flat a gang of men gathers. All day and night. They have easy access to her up a stairwell...

I saw it in action when I ran to the scene of an unexploded hand grenade in a bin outside the police station of a no-go area of town, near a mosque. I asked the police who the target was...

Later I went back to walk the no-go suburbs, ending up back in the centre of the town. A week earlier this place was torched and looted as the world looked on.

I wondered what was strange, besides the weird calm. And realised it was that I was the only woman in the place. Everyone else was young, African and male. Speaking Arabic. Hanging about, utterly without purpose.

Frustrated, I asked a few of them what they were doing, what was the point, what they would ever achieve by standing about. The mum in me was furious.

'F*ck off, you white woman whore, go suck your mum,' they replied, and proceeded to demonstrate what they did to their 'little white girlfriends'...

Emphasis mine.

So the women cannot go out in the street any more. They are locked inside their apartments. Outside are groups of feral migrants, gathering, for the sake of argument, in groups of 10.

How do you reverse this and get to the point where attacks are so rare that women will make the educated decision that going out is actually safe? How do you get the feral migrants off the street permanently? Recall that their armaments include everything up to and including grenades. Also recall that they, unlike native Swedes, come from very violent countries.

Further, Western legal systems are designed for ordered, civilized society and have neither the flow rate nor the capacity to handle large numbers of ferals.

Finally, the migrants are having children much faster than the locals and they are not assimilating.

How does this not end in retreat?

Wednesday, June 04, 2025

It's Not That He's Crazy

 ... it's that he most certainly isn't crazy.

Dig this video from the guy who set fire to a group of Jews in Boulder, CO just a few days ago.

Far from being mad, he is calm, rational and his ideas are well-considered. Everything he is saying is consistent with Islam.

Tuesday, June 03, 2025

On Jordan Peterson And The Virgin Mary

A few clips have gone viral from this video of Jordan facing off against 20 atheists. Sitting in a room with 20 smarmy atheists and being recorded on video is apparently a thing. I didn't watch any of it because it makes my skin itch just to think of what it must have been like to sit in a room with a prep school debate club hopped up on Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens.

I did hear a bit of audio from one of the clips where a particularly pushy punk kid shoved the Catholic beliefs about the Virgin Mary in Jordan's face, accused Jordan of being Catholic and demanded he explain the doctrine of Mary.

Lots of people, many of them Catholics, have objected to this or that reply by Jordan during that odious session, but I won't do so without hearing them and I almost certainly wouldn't do so after hearing them, either. What in the world would motivate me to do that? The entire setup is in bad faith.

Why ask Jordan about the Virgin Mary? If you want to understand the Catholic perspective on the subject, sit down with a theologian of some repute and have a calm discussion about it. Going into a room of 20 midget feral hogs and getting attacked isn't an indication of the feral hogs' desire to learn anything, it's simply an act of interlocutory BDSM.

The bigger issue isn't with Jordan or Catholicism, it's with the thought processes of the atheists. Objecting to a theory of reality without a superior substitute isn't argument at all, it's just banging your spoon on your high chair and screaming. As far as the theology of Mary goes, I simply don't care enough to study it. Why should I? More to the point, why should anyone reply to that atheist's snarky questions?

Catholicism is a holistic hypothesis about existence. It explains cosmology, ethics, morality, purpose, meaning, science, evolution, philosophy, the origin of life and more. Scientific atheism, on its best day, is a small subset of Catholicism. That is, there is almost nothing the atheists have, such as science, that we don't have as well. There is a ton of stuff we do have that they don't.

Atheists playing gotcha games with some obscure aspect of Catholicism is like being on the losing side of a 35-3 NFL game and mocking the winning team because they only ran for 170 yards and not 175. Ha ha ha, Catholics! Take that!

My response to, "Do you know about the Catholic beliefs on the Virgin Mary?" would be a very quick, "No because I don't care."

Good Lord, not this foolish nitpickery again.

Wednesday, May 28, 2025

The Role Of Christian Men In A Violent, Competitive World

... is this.

For the TL;DR crowd, here's the post in a nutshell.

From my last post wherein I pondered if life was peaceful back when single-celled algae occupied the top  rung of the evolutionary ladder. Life was not peaceful, it was filled with microscopic predations.

The whole model of the world God made is effectively, while not utterly, Darwinian. Violent competition is a part of life at all levels. It is into that world that Jesus came. It is that world that gives us the dramatic conflicts of our lives, conflict being a necessary element of any story.

Christian life happens within a context of violence. The violence is inescapable. God designed the world this way and it is in this structure that we must practice our Christianity.

From the summary post in my series on sex, Sex, SEX!

Women, in a primal environment, are neither strong nor independent. Women can only be strong and independent if they can afford to have men create a barrier between them and the primal world. Some can afford that, most cannot.

Women have babies. Women are required for the continuation of the species. If you want to get all Biblical, the divine injunction from the beginning was "be fruitful and multiply." If you're going to do that in a world of violence, then men are going to have to protect women.

If God created a world based on violent competition, and He did, then all environments are primal. Further, women are nearly always vulnerable. When young children are involved, they are hopelessly vulnerable. When young children are not involved, you get South Korea and Japan, places where women are not as vulnerable because they don't have any children.


Clearly, that does not satisfy the "be fruitful and multiply" divine exam question.

An unburdened woman is small, softer, weaker, less aggressive and slower than a man. A woman who is pregnant is practically immobile late in the pregnancy. A nursing mother may as well have a target on her back and one with a toddler isn't much better. And no, the stay-at-home dad isn't the solution. The mom is still the one who produces the milk baby needs. Sending your woman to bring you back sustenance is suboptimal in a violent, competitive world.

Then there's the matter of food. Even if you're a vegan, you have to fight for your food. You fight other creatures who want to prey on your crops. You fight the elements - drought, floods, poor soil. Life is an endless series of violent competition even for the priests in the pulpit who preach Teletubby sermons.

Working from the top of your loyalty hierarchy down, you must protect and provide for your woman. Then you must protect and provide for your children. Then family, clan, neighborhood, town and so forth. As a man, you must do it because the women are unsuited for this job.

So the romantic, chivalric image above tells what you need to be as a man in the Darwinian world God created. Vigilant, powerful, dangerous, protective and competent, the man builds a wall around his woman and, by extension, his family and civilization itself, wherein higher order arts might flower.

By the way, I've always loved the expression on the face of the girl in that image. She is absolutely glowing with pleasure. Her knight makes the world safe for her at the same time he makes her feel like the most beautiful and desirable girl in the world. That is his job as a man in a dangerous world. He is there to protect, provide and cherish.

Exit question: What are her responsibilities towards him?

God Is Love

So the Teletubby priests and deacons with their nauseatingly sweet sermons are right about one thing. We men, bristling and growling, must act with love as our central motivation. That is the whole drama of life, the central moral conflict we have to navigate.

How do I protect and provide in a violent, competitive world while keeping love, forgiveness and charity as my central moral guides?

Sometimes you can be all kissy-kissy love-love and sometimes you can't. Even motivated by Christian love, there are times when you have to choose violence. If that was never the best choice, life wouldn't have any dramatic conflict and we'd all undulate around cooing at each other.

When that choice has to be made, you need to be skilled at aggressive, protective decisions and actions.

I hope you love Jesus because you're about to meet Him.

Friday, May 23, 2025

Nature Is Red In Cilia And Membrane

There are a lot of interesting things going on in current events and I have ignorant opinions about all of it, but I really wanted to explore something else: What can we infer about Jesus' message from the nature of the world God created?

Chatting away with ChatGPT, hereafter referred to as AI, about my current favorite topic - the Kumeyaay of San Diego and Khoisan of South Africa - I brought up one of my favorite jokes.

If we want to give the land back to its original inhabitants, if we want to do land acknowledgements, if we want to atone for the sins of imperialism, then the recipients of our restitution really ought to be ... single-celled algae.

It's time we gave back the land. And, of course, the water, too.

Pulling that thread, AI and I discussed who and what were present back in the halcyon days of yore when single-celled algae was the dominant life form. Did the flora and fauna include any predators?

Absolutely. AI's summary:

Types of Early Predators

1. Large predatory bacteria

  • Example: Bdellovibrio-like organisms (today these are tiny bacteria that invade other bacteria).
  • Prey: Smaller bacteria.
  • Method: Some burrowed into prey cells and digested them from the inside.

2. Eukaryotic predators (protists)

  • Example: These were single-celled organisms with a nucleus, and they were more complex than bacteria or archaea. Likely ancestors of modern amoebae and flagellates.
  • Prey: Bacteria, other protists, and perhaps algae.
  • Method: Phagocytosis—they surrounded prey with their cell membrane, enclosed it in a bubble (vacuole), and digested it internally using enzymes.

How Did They Eat?

Phagocytosis (literally "cell eating")

The predator would approach its prey—usually a smaller microbe—detect it chemically, and wrap part of its membrane around it. This created a food vacuole, like a tiny stomach inside the cell. Digestive enzymes broke down the prey, and nutrients were absorbed.

Examples of feeding behavior:

  • Amoeboid predators flowed around their prey like goo, engulfing them.
  • Flagellated protists used whips or hairs to move and sometimes to stir prey-rich water toward themselves.
  • Ciliates (if present) may have used coordinated hair-like cilia to sweep prey into a cell mouth-like structure.

Imperialsm!

They might as well have worn red uniforms, carried Martini-Henry rifles and worn their beards in the Imperial style.

This is an electron microscope photo of early Eukaryotic predators. No, really, it is.

God Is Love

As we know from Pope Francis' document, Amoris Teletubbius, God is love and that's all He is. Just love. And also cuddles and soft blankets and gentle voices. Yes, God is love. Kissy-kissy love-love. St. Tinky-Winky said so as well.

Oh, Please

Seriously, what are these pathologically feminine prelates on about? The whole model of the world God made is effectively, while not utterly, Darwinian. Violent competition is a part of life at all levels. It is into that world that Jesus came. It is that world that gives us the dramatic conflicts of our lives, conflict being a necessary element of any story. Our lives are art expressed through our bodies and our actions and that expression forms the story we author with our lives.

It is in such a world, deliberately and purposefully created this way, that we are called to serve God, love our neighbors, forgive each other and care for the least among us.

The world in which Jesus lived, the time and place of his life, was implicitly violent and harsh. You didn't need to tell anyone in Judea circa 30 AD that life was violent and competitive by nature. It was only once we invented faculty lounges and 300-count cotton sheets that we forgot that.

Our pathologically feminine leaders have forgotten the true nature of the world God made. They deliberately close their eyes to the canvas and palette He expects us to use to create the art which is our lives, the tools we must employ to serve Him.

The Devouring Bishop

This leads me back to Carl Jung's Devouring Mother.

Devouring mothers, particularly, are characterized by over-nurturing, smothering, overly protective, and possessive behaviors.

"Cardinal McElroy, please pick up the white courtesy phone ..." 

Exit Questions

What is the proper role of a man in a world red in cilia and membrane if he is to serve his family, build and maintain civilization and serve God with love and charity? What do Jesus' teachings mean for men in a violent and competitive world?

Tuesday, May 20, 2025

Casually Asserting Nonsense

Dig this from the mayor of our 3rd largest city.

Now check out this snippet from Mein Kampf.

A State has never arisen from commercial causes for the purpose of peacefully serving commercial ends; but States have always arisen from the instinct to maintain the racial group, whether this instinct manifest itself in the heroic sphere or in the sphere of cunning and chicanery. In the first case we have the Aryan States, based on the principles of work and cultural development.

Emphasis mine.

The casual tone of "of course, we all know this to be true" sings out from both examples.

How in the world do you get to this point?

You know, if we could just engineer a race of black Aryans, we'd really have something, right?

Err, right?

Monday, May 19, 2025

There Are No Aryans

Recall Galatians 3:28:

There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free person, there is not male and female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

If someone at work, through duplicity or dishonesty, torpedoes your project or gets the promotion, does it make you feel any better if he shares your race?

I was thinking more about the Afrikaner / Khoisan / Zulu affair yesterday and, of course, the Spanish / Kumeyaay / Comanche parallel as well and realized that the Khoisan / Kumeyaay were doomed no matter who contacted them first. In fact, that scene must have been reenacted thousands and thousands of times throughout history where a primitive tribe gets swallowed up or annihilated by a more advanced one.

What does it matter to the people whose culture is being obliterated what color the invaders are?

In Nazi terms, think about two Aryans. One is shy, bookish and unathletic. The other looks like an NFL linebacker and is aggressive. What difference does it make to the bookish Helmut if the beastly Fritz that takes his lunch pfennigs every day is also an Aryan?

This is at the heart of the Nazi illogic and the truth of St. Paul's letter to the Galatians. Our intersection is not in our racial heritage, but in He Who Made The World. All lifelines cross at that point. The orthodox Catholic kid in the wheelchair at Children's Hospital is related in that most profound way to the atheist, lesbian activist angrily waving her sign at a rally.

Just for illustrative fun, I worked with ChatGPT and wrote a hypothetical conversation between two Kumeyaay who are grateful that their way of life was being annihilated by the Comanche and not the Spanish.

Enjoy.

Title: Blessings from the North

Characters:

  • Tochpai – A weathered Kumeyaay elder, deeply skeptical but clinging to cultural optimism.

  • Mekhan – A younger tribesman, earnest, confused, and loyal to tradition.

Setting:
A low fire smolders in a San Diego canyon. The sun is setting. Dust hangs in the air. In the distance, a Comanche war party has recently passed through, leaving carnage and chaos. Spanish friars are rumored to be days behind them.


TOCHPAI: (staring into the fire) Well... at least they shared our skin color.

MEKHAN: (nursing a bruised shoulder) Yes, uncle. It is comforting to know the men who lashed me to the cactus and took my sister now ride under the same sun as we do.

TOCHPAI: Mm. And did you see how proudly they galloped? So free. So... non-European.

MEKHAN: I did admire that. Especially how they didn't burden themselves with roads, books, or crops.

TOCHPAI: Exactly. You let your land speak for you. And they let our blood speak for them. Such reverence.

MEKHAN: (quietly) Do you think the friars will be worse?

TOCHPAI: (snorts) What, with their bread ovens and adobe churches? Their medicines and insufferable alphabet?

MEKHAN: And their... music? I've heard rumors they bring music with harmony. Scales. Repetition.

TOCHPAI: (shudders) Repetition is a tool of conquest.

MEKHAN: But uncle, they say the friars also take children into schools.

TOCHPAI: Precisely. Have you no sense? A child in school is a child not being forcibly traded for ammunition and captives by a noble horseman of the plains.

MEKHAN: Indeed. When the Comanche came, they didn't ask us to kneel. They just lit the huts and told us to scream as loud as we could so they could hear our spirits. And when they tortured my child to death in front of me, I admit I found it culturally enriching. After all, their skin color is roughly the same as ours. It felt... inclusive.

TOCHPAI: So spiritually attuned. Whereas the friars—colonial beasts that they are—will no doubt ask us to write our names.

MEKHAN: (gasps) In cursive?

TOCHPAI: Likely.

MEKHAN: Monsters.

TOCHPAI: But don't worry, my son. For a brief, shining moment, we were liberated by fellow aboriginals who neither planted nor preached, but simply took. And what a gift that is.

MEKHAN: (looks around at the smoking ruins of the village) Yes. What a gift.

TOCHPAI: Come. Let us gather what is left and sing a mourning song for our culture. Before someone builds a chapel on top of it.

MEKHAN: Or a granary.

TOCHPAI: (deep sigh) Such cruelty.

It could be worse. Our kids could be learning to read.

Saturday, May 17, 2025

Pete Buttigieg Is Toast

This was simply mind blowing to watch.

I had thought Biden was in bad shape, but in private, he was worse than my father was the month before he died.

They all knew. Everyone in the administration and everyone in the DC press corps knew. Anyone who served in the administration might as well pack it up and go home to find another career outside of politics. There is no answer, no mea culpa, no finger-pointing that can absolve any of them from perpetrating the Biden charade on the entire country for 4 years.

Politics isn't beanbag and their presidential rivals from the crop of Democrat governors are going to absolutely nuke them over this. There will be no obfuscation, redirection or defense that will suffice.

Pete Buttigieg is wandering the landscape these days, clearly prepping for a presidential run. He should save his money and slip into obscurity for his own sake.

The president of the United States was a vegetable and they all worked hard to hide it from us. What more needs to be said?

Friday, May 16, 2025

The Moral Calculus Of Hunter-Gatherers

 ... or rather, the moral calculus of encountering hunter-gatherers.

Late Add: It just dawned on me after originally posting this that the underlying question I've been wrestling with for some time is: How did we get to the point where Nazi logic makes sense? Having read most of Mein Kampf and consumed a decent amount of Nazi propaganda, modern parallels with the Nazis' distortion and selective application of history simply scream at me whenever I encounter the rantings of the dominant culture with its emphasis on white guilt.

How did we get here? That's a question for future posts, but I just wanted to plant that in your head while you go through this.

After noodling the Afrikaner question and pondering how the black majority is South Africa is seeking a final solution to it, I began to wonder about the proper behavior for any settler upon encountering sparse populations of evolutionarily trapped hunter-gatherers.

Tim brought up some objections to my use of AI as a research tool, but I thought about it as I chatted with ChatGPT and never saw any glaring contradictions. The climate and terrain of San Diego is pretty similar to parts of South Africa. We, too, had our hunter-gatherer indigenous population, the Kumeyaay. Like the Khoisan in South Africa, they were eventually encountered by Europeans. In our case, the Spanish, in their case, the Dutch.

When I go hiking here in San Diego, I can't help but put myself in the moccasins of the Kumeyaay. Just what was it like to live that way? Could you imaging being born into that in, say, the year 1320? Come August, when there has been no rain for months, there is absolutely nothing to eat out there. I guess you might be able to catch some insects or something, but your whole day would be spent just trying to glean a subsistence from the dry chapparal or the tidepools on the coast.

When AI asserted that the population density was on the order of 1 person for every 3 square miles, it was totally believable.

So just what were the Euros supposed to do? They had come great distances on the ocean and were trying to open trade routes to other nations. When they landed at Capetown or trekked up the West Coast to what is now San Diego, pulled out their spyglasses and saw 3 people wandering around on a hillside miles away, were they supposed to get back on their boats and leave?

That's not a rhetorical question. It is, in fact, the central moral question being raised by the decolonizers. What was the appropriate response to encountering the Khoisan or the Kumeyaay?

You couldn't negotiate with them because there was no central authority with whom you could sign treaties. You couldn't buy the land from them because the whole concept of land ownership was unintelligible to them. Father Junipero Serra tried to educate and civilize them and that, apparently, was evil. Some Kumeyaay didn't like it at all and frequently tried to return to their native ways of foraging in the scrub brush for roots and small game.

Here's the elephant in the room: Why is this moral conundrum never posed for the Zulu or the Apache?

No, seriously. Why doesn't this moral no-win scenario apply to Africans or the American Indians? They, too, expanded and encountered hunter-gatherer tribes. When that happened, they were, err, a bit on the rough side, if you know what I mean.

So why don't the decolonizer types blow a gasket over that?

The question answers itself.

Thursday, May 15, 2025

The Proper Way To Deal With Harvard

 ... and the other Ivies is this.


Seriously. It's not that the Ivies are teaching ignorance, it's that they are deliberately misinforming their students because they hate us.

I've spent less than an hour in total noodling around with ChatGPT on the topic of the Afrikaners and in that time, it's become obvious that from the start, the Dutch and British had no idea that anyone lived in South Africa, not in any sense that people from the 1600s understood.

If I can glean this from idly chatting with AI in less than half a day, the professors at Harvard and elsewhere certainly know it. To go from that reality to a point where their student bodies are convulsed with antisemitic rage rooted in a hatred of all things "colonial" and white or white-adjacent is the result of active, determined, hate-filled malice on the part of the faculties.

The Harvardians should be accorded the same rights and import that we give the KKK and the neo-Nazis. They're free to spew their vile nonsense, but we don't purposefully give them our children to educate.

Here are some of the data points AI and I discussed today.

The population density of South Africa when the Dutch arrived was about about 1 person for every 3 square miles. No wonder the Dutch thought it was empty.

Exactly. When the Dutch landed in 1652 and looked around the Western Cape, what they saw was:

  • Vast stretches of unfenced land,
  • No towns, no roads, no visible cultivation,
  • The occasional small band of Khoikhoi herders,
  • And no political structure to negotiate with.

To European eyes, this was terra nullius—"nobody's land." And by European standards, it practically was.

One person every 3 square miles?

  • That’s half the density of the least-populated U.S. counties today.
  • You could walk for days without seeing another soul.
  • Even the pastures used by the Khoikhoi were rotational and seasonal, meaning large swaths looked entirely unused for most of the year.

The Dutch didn’t need to invent a justification—they saw one.

  • In their worldview, ownership required visible use: fences, crops, buildings.
  • The Khoikhoi had none of that.
  • Their lifestyle left no permanent mark on the land, and so the Dutch believed they were simply taking up unused space.

They weren’t trying to be cruel—they were operating on European assumptions of civilization, which required:

  • Settlement
  • Cultivation
  • Hierarchy
  • Borders

And none of those things existed in the precolonial Cape.

The Dutch didn't even see it as conquering a land because as far as they could tell, almost no one was there

Exactly. And that psychological framing is crucial to understanding the Dutch mindset—and why they didn’t even think of themselves as colonizers at first.

To them, they weren’t seizing land. They were:

  • Establishing a supply station at the Cape (for VOC ships en route to Asia),
  • Putting “unused” land to productive use (grazing, farming, fort-building),
  • And encountering no formal state, no armies, no borders—just scattered bands of herders and hunters with no fixed dwellings or territorial claims in the European sense.

The faculty at Harvard know all of this. Driven by a frothing-mad hatred of all things European-derived, they fill our children's heads with deliberate falsehoods akin to Hitler's ranting about the historical justifications for considering the Jewish race to be parasitic.

With the same results.

Hmm. Maybe this would be a better analogy for how to deal with Harvard.


Bonus Data Point

They are in the grips of a mania.