Sunday, December 08, 2024

Don't Judge Self-Licking Ice Cream Cones

If you didn't know, a self-licking ice cream cone is metaphorical shorthand for an organization or person whose sole output is the justification of its existence. For example, a research study that produces research grant proposals for more studies that produce research grant proposals is a self-licking ice cream cone.

Today, we extend yesterday's journey into the world of non-judgmental Catholics to self-licking virtue cones. In that post, I described how I managed to detonate a small bomb within my group of Catholic men by pulling logic threads after one of them claimed that there really isn't any universal, objective moral law after all, contradicting the teachings of the Church. My main point was this, taken from an analysis of the story of the woman caught in adultery in John 8:3-11.

You can have a universal, objective moral code without stoning people to death. My groupies were conflating judging with punishing.

My detonations were triggered by one of the guys in my group, Sam.

Sam volunteers on the RCIA team at his parish. RCIA is where people who want to convert to Catholicism are taught about the faith and learn just how much we hate everyone else and how to properly light a fire underneath someone tied to a stake. As a part of it, he was talking about LGBT for some reason. I think one of his current crop is gay or trans or something. He told us how he doesn't judge and how they're all wonderful people and he doesn't judge them and how he accepts their moral choices being different than his own and how, did I say this already? - he doesn't judge.

Recalling the session, the RCIA candidate he told us about was trans. I don't know if it's a male-to-female trans or a female-to-male trans. It hardly matters. Either way, the trans person is completely screwed.

As we've never conducted large-scale experiments on young people, giving them regular, massive doses of wrong-sex hormones and mutilating their bodies by hacking off sex organs, trying to build fake ones, we've not had access to statistically significant outcome data. Blessedly, we are starting to get that data now. As the incandescently cheerful and blithely non-judgmental Sam might say, "Isn't science wonderful? Look at all the data we now have showing that poisoning and mutilating people leads to poor outcomes. I never would have been able to predict that without tens of thousands of experimental subjects!"

Biochemistry, unlike Sam and his compadres in the Church, is remorselessly judgmental. The data is coming in and it's ghastly. The trans industry has tried to suppress it, but it hardly matters. Everyone knew what it was going to say decades before the experiments were conducted.


If you don't want to click on that link, here's an excerpt of that thread from X.

It gets worse. Are you familiar with her Orwellian paper where they cut the breasts off over 40 girls age 13+ and gave them a "chest dysphoria" questionnaire that assumed they still had breasts? (asked if they bind at night, etc) 

At best it was an oblique measure of phantom breast syndrome, completely tautological to find a reduction after you cut them off.

She also withheld most of the outcome variables of her 2023 study giving hormones to kids (as opposed to blockers), and didn't disclose in the journal article that those variables even existed, making it fraud. See the image for some of the variables, from the study protocol doc. They reported Beck depression, anxiety, life sat, positive affect, and appearance congruence. That's it.

They **didn't report** suicidal ideation, resilience, negative affect, self-harm, stress, autism spectrum, and a bunch of others, including peer/parent ratings.

This is satanic. Meanwhile, my Catholic friends who don't judge smile warmly and preen about their compassion and inclusivity.

The trans people are the walking dead. There is absolutely no doubt that their conditions will only worsen with time. In order to maintain your appearance as the wrong sex, you must continue to take massive doses of wrong-sex hormones for the rest of your life. If it harms you in the short run, it doesn't take a computer model to figure out that it's going to harm you even more a couple of years down the road.

Further, Trump's victory spells an end to the trans people's primary payoff - social approval. As most of them will never again achieve an orgasm, the benefits are not sexual. Instead, it is the adulation and praise they get from their peers and society in general that makes it all worthwhile.

Trump ran one ad more than any other. It was the one showing that Kamala wanted to give trans-affirming care to prison inmates and illegals. They poured money into that ad campaign like water. The Democrats got mauled in the election and can see that the trans issue is a political loser. Kamala's supporters within the party and their toadies in industry, education, entertainment and the media see it, too. Loyalty is to the party, not the cause which means that the social support for trans is going to evaporate.

The trans people are the walking dead and I would bet that most of them will take their own lives. It was all a lie and as their conditions worsen and their payoffs vanish, they will face lives of pain, suffering and despair. Since the trans movement is distinctly atheistic, there will be no moral impediment to suicide.

Self-Licking Virtue Cones

The nice thing about it for Sam, my bishop, my diocesan university and all the other Catholics who simper about inclusion and affirmation is that they will be happy to walk the parents to their kids' graves after the funeral service. They will be as warm and loving and supportive and non-judgmental with the grieving parents as they were with the kids' gender delusions.

It's virtue all the way down.

My goodness, you two certainly did a great job maintaining Dani's old bedroom. I'll bet she felt your warmth and love, coming back home to visit before she killed herself.

No comments: