When a religious view is contradicted by a well-established scientific fact, then the sources of revelation have to be re-examined, and they will be found to leave the question open. When a clearly-defined dogma contradicts a scientific assertion, the latter has to be revised, and it will be found premature. When both contradicting assertions, the religious and the scientific, are nothing more than prevailing theories, research will be stimulated in both directions, until one of the theories appears unfounded.If established science and accepted matters of faith collide, science wins and the matters of faith are re-examined. Way cool!
Update: Don't take this as a slap at anyone else. It's just something that made me smile.