I couldn't find the tweet I wanted to include here, but this image will have to do. Do you know why Muslimas must dress like this?
In Islam, they believe that men cannot be expected to control their sexual desires. To prevent sexual sin, women must cover themselves completely. The image I had in mind was a still from a BBC interview with a woman covered even more completely than this, where you could only see her eyes.
Aside: Will Neuralink technology make the niqab obsolete? If women had sensors in their clothing that provided them visual information from the world around them, they wouldn't even need the eye slits any more.
If you tell boys from a very young age that they cannot control their sexual urges and that women must safeguard themselves by dressing in sacks, what do you think that does to their attitudes towards women as they reach adulthood? Forget the whole male guardian thing and all the legal second-class status for women issues, just think about how you bend males in your society when this is front and center in public every day all day. Every woman you see on the street reinforces the notion that men cannot control themselves.
If you can't control yourself when you see a Western chick dressed normally, then this is no big deal.
🚨🇬🇧 Pakistani Amar Mehraj kidnapped a 17-year-old British girl. He hit her in the head with a rock and dragged her across the ground.
— Radio Europe (@RadioEuropes) August 12, 2025
Amar took her to a house, drugged her, and then r*ped her. He invited three other Pakistani migrants to the house and made money from it.
Amar… pic.twitter.com/p5ewmqF9Pv
He did it because, when he saw her, he wanted to have sex with her and he knew, just knew that it was pointless to try to control himself.
To this guy, the trial must have seemed like a Kafka play. He could not control himself, yet he was on trial for not having controlled himself. Madness!
This post came about after I saw several videos of Muslim men in England smirking and smiling when confronted by British men who had caught them approaching little girls in parks or outside schools. It was jarring to see how the Muslims thought the whole interrogation was both surreal and comical. How in the world could they be suppressing laughter as they were being threatened?
A frustrated, frightened and angry British woman posting on X clued me in. She said something like, "Every time you see a veiled Muslima, see instead the Islamic teaching that men can't be expected to control themselves."
With that mental model, it all made sense. The Muslim women are wearing protective clothing that keep them safe from men. You, a Western girl, are not. They can relax in public. You cannot.
The multiculturalists don't know how anything works. They haven't worked through the dynamics of Islamic society and how they play out in daily life. The Islamic idea that women are responsible for preventing rapes and sexual assaults through their dress may or may not work, but it's real and it is utterly incompatible with the behavior of Western women.
You'd think they would have thought of that, but they didn't.
Recycling For The Win
This was pretty stunning. It turns out the British government recycles all the dinghies that come across the channel carrying "migrants." I wonder if they get their deposit back with each one. In any case, whatever it is the British government says about trying to stop illegal immigration, they clearly aren't if they send the boats back to France to get reloaded and used again.
Ex-MP Andrew Bridgen claims the Home Office uses GXO Logistics (30% share ownership Vanguard, Blackrock) to truck the dingys back to France for the next wave of migrants. GXO has a multi-million pound contract with @Keir_Starmer's traitor government.pic.twitter.com/XfbezX2MSE
— Paul Weston (@PWestoff) August 12, 2025
Exit Question: How will an Islamic Europe change America?
A Muslim Europe means we don't have allies in Europe anymore, and there is no point in NATO, we can save our money there. Focus on the Pacific.
ReplyDeleteI have a question. Why does Trump treat allies badly (strong arming them with tariffs to get a better deal), but treats enemies with kid gloves. He's way to soft on Putin and China. Why does he continue to allow Tik-Tok under enemy Communist ownership.