Pages

Sunday, July 16, 2017

Notre Dame Abandons Catholic Grace

An appalling article from Elizabeth Corey at First Things.
I recently attended an academic conference at the University of Notre Dame called “Intersectional Inquiries and Collaborative Action: Gender and Race...”

Intersectionality is a wholly academic invention that plays a large role in this movement. Indeed, it stands in the vanguard of the progressive academy, allied with critical race studies, queer studies, women’s studies, and ethnic studies. Intersectional scholars proudly proclaim their goal: to smash the neoliberal, corporate, heteropatriarchal academy and then to reinvent it in a way that rejects traditional notions about what universities are meant to do. These scholars also want to redefine the family and to abolish the “binary” of man and woman...

At the end there was a question and answer period. I asked whether and how Collins would suggest that intersectionality engage with its adversaries, the ­hated conservatives. Given the polarization of ­America right now, did she see some way for the two camps to communicate or find common ground? The vehemence of her answer was startling. “No,” she said. “You cannot bring these two worlds together. You must be oppositional. You must fight. For me, it’s a line in the sand.” This was at once jarring and clarifying.
Notre Dame was once a Catholic university. I guess they've decided to ditch that frowsty, confining bit of errant nonsense and embrace, err, diversity.

We're all members of groups, some oppressed, some oppressing. The oppressed must band together and fight the oppressors à outrance. That's Notre Dame for you, always seeking knowledge and truth. Not Truth, mind you, that's an outmoded Catholic concept. No, it's truth. My truth, your truth, his truth, zer truth. With everyone defining their own truth, we could end up anywhere, from gas chambers to burkas for women to bayonets and trenches to John Lennon's Imagine. My money's on the bayonets and trenches. That's the way these things usually go.

And the whole Catechism thing with those silly ideas about Grace, forgiveness, love and individual redemption? Ha! What a joke. Nope, we're on this side or that. OK, that's a generalization. Actually, we're on one of any number of ever pixelating sides, but suffice it to say that there's white cis-males and everyone else*. I hope you weren't attached to that Jesus dude talking about loving each person as an individual. As Patricia Hill Collins, giving the rousing call to unrelenting combat action might say, "Come on everyone, over the top!"

Notre Dame, everyone. Let's give them a big hand.

Sigh. Once upon a time, I thought the Church stood for something like this.


I guess not.

* - Once they've dealt with the white cis-males, they'll be back to settle you, you oppressive hegemonist. You can rest assured that you're nowhere near the bottom, err, top of the oppressed pecking order.

7 comments:

  1. What's truly sad is - if - when - they get what they want, they really aren't going to like what they find.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As Kurt Schlicter has said, they're not going to like living under the new rules.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I suppose there were always plenty of idiots but maybe the idiots of old were aware of their limitations, the current crop of idiots are too idiotic to even have an inkling of their idiocy. And they have such loud voices

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ligneus - precisely! In the past, people were told when they wrong, and as those who were acting/thinking stupidly grew up, they learned to either be quiet or to expect yet another smack down for being wrong. Today nobody loses, everyone gets a trophy, and nothing is wrong. Net result, the idiots think they are smart and that their ideas are worthwhile.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I keep thinking back to the conference you wrote about last week with the full page of check marks to identify the woman's "gender".

    Think of the architect and engineer designing a new building. This floor will need 38 restrooms, the next floor will need 42.


    I gave blood on Friday, they had to ask me if I was male.

    I remember my had reading newspaper articles and getting upset at the parallels between those modern times and the fall of the Roman Empire. The 70s got nothing on us now.

    ReplyDelete
  6. They asked if you were male? Awesome. I hope you answered by describing how to service the drum brakes on an MGB.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If I was a SJW, I would probably be insulted. The questionnaire you do only has male/female, and the nurse said something to the effect of "and you are a male right?".

    But really, a legitimate question is "how many separate restroom facilities need to be built?"

    I do need to adjust the rear brakes, and so many other things on the B...

    ReplyDelete