I can tell you how I'd spend that $300K if it were mine. |
When officials at the University of California at Los Angeles began negotiating a $300,000 speech appearance by Hillary Rodham Clinton, the school had one request: Could we get a reduced rate for public universities?The money is just the beginning. There are scads of special demands. My favorite was this one.
The answer from Clinton’s representatives: $300,000 is the “special university rate.”
After a lengthy call with a Clinton representative, UCLA administrator Patricia Lippert reported to campus colleagues, “She uses a lavalier [microphone] and will both speak from the audience and walk around stage, TED talk style. We need a teleprompter and 2-3 downstage scrolling monitors [for] her to read from.”Outstanding! She will walk around the stage like a real professional speaker would do, acting like it's all spontaneous as a pair of huge video screens fill her empty head with thoughts written by someone else.
For heaven's sake, would it kill her to memorize her speech? It's not like she's saying anything new or revolutionary. She hasn't had an original thought in her life. Everything is calculated and hedged. What does it say for her intellect that she can't manage to mechanically regurgitate her progressive platitudes by now?
And how about UCLA? What a pack of rubes. If I had a kid in their MBA program, I'd withrdraw him immediately. If you can't convince your administration that 300 Gs is insanely overpriced for someone who reads pablum to you, you should all be fired and the school shut down.
Stepping back a bit further, this is beautiful. A politically hyper-connected, pampered, egocentric woman with insignificant credentials is being paid $300,000 of taxpayer funds to blather about income inequality and why even more needs to be taken from the taxpayer. I think this has all played out before.
Hillary Clinton = Eva Peron.
Catican Note: Have a Happy Thanksgiving! I seldom do holiday posts and was going to do one today when I saw this. Oh well. Here in the Compound, we hope you eat up, watch football, make merry and share love with the family.
The article notes that it's not student funds paying the teleprompter reader, it's a foundation paying her foundation. You missed the whole tax avoidance angle to this. People who think the rich need to be taxed more are usually rich people who know how to game the tax system.
ReplyDeleteAnd I think the move money from one foundation to another. What a great scam. So I don't think SHE actually "receives" the lucre. It goes to the Clinton Foundation. Which proceeds to disburse the moolah to... Hillary and Bill! I would love to be a forensic accountant checking those books.
ReplyDeleteIt looks like a simple money laundering scheme.
ReplyDelete