Dig this.
Across the country, at least ten states, including Washington, are now exploring or have already passed an exit or wealth tax to combat revenue losses from residents fleeing to lower tax areashttps://t.co/rSrea03PNm
— KOMO News (@komonews) April 8, 2026
And this.
The past five years have seen a massive migration of Americans out of heavily Democratic counties and into ones where Donald Trump won majorities in each of the past three elections. That’s according to an exclusive analysis by Issues & Insights of the latest Census Bureau and election data.
Most analyses of internal migration patterns look only at state-level data. And what they show is that blue states are losing population to red states, and have been for many years.
I&I wanted to go deeper, so we used the latest Census data on migration between counties, and compared that with how these counties voted in the past three presidential elections.
What we found was that millions aren’t just moving out of blue states, but are moving out of blue counties within states.
Add on top of that the likely decision by the Supreme Court to uphold birthright citizenship even in the face of massive Chinese birth tourism where there may be as many as 200,000 Chinese in China who were born here and then quickly whisked back home. The blue states will absolutely be sending them mail-in ballots which will be perfectly legal.
How long can that go on and get worse as more and more foreign governments take advantage of the situation to create massive numbers of Manchurian Voters? When do the red states, becoming redder by the day, say they've had enough?
It's not just a sorting of the population, it's a realignment of irreconcilable camps. It's almost like the Southern cadets and instructors at West Point mounting their horses and riding home after secession, but before the start of the war.
Add to that this, which is being uncovered in several forms in several blue cities.
California Governor Gavin Newsom is embroiled in a national fraud scandal. Thus far, much of the coverage has focused on alleged schemes related to unemployment insurance, hospice care, and food stamps. In this exclusive investigation, we shine a light on one of California’s largest initiatives: the In-Home Supportive Services Program, or IHSS, which pays family members and other individuals to provide home-based care for the elderly and disabled—at a cost of nearly $30 billion per year.
On the surface, IHSS presents itself as an instrument of compassion, directing billions to caregivers who help with cooking, personal care, laundry, and other daily needs inside recipients’ homes. But a growing number of experts and critics argue that the program is rife with fraud, losing roughly an estimated $6 billion to $12 billion yearly to scammers. Meantime, the state’s powerful home-care unions collect more than $149 million in membership dues, funneling money into the political network supporting Newsom and California Democrats.
The level of fraud is so great that it is impossible to believe that the fraud wasn't planned by everyone involved.
How long can this last?
Minnesota had one thing that it had bragging rights for. It was the undisputed "Fraud Capital of the World".
ReplyDeleteBut Newsom couldn't abide. He has to step in on OUR thing.
The fraud is very well organized, and it is carefully protected by the leftists.
Here's something I just realized. If the Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, it will be perfectly legal and completely rational for blue cities and blue states to advertise and subsidize birth tourism. Why open the borders to illegals and get all that voter rage if you can quietly import voters by birth?
ReplyDelete" massive Chinese birth tourism where there may be as many as 200,000 Chinese in China who were born here"
ReplyDeleteEh? Why use China as the example? The population of the US is around 340 million, 200,000 is only 0.06%. That wouldn't even be a rounding error in a national US election, assuming that you even could convince any significant fraction of them to submit absentee ballots. And how would you even decide which state would "get" them?
There are up to 1.6 million Mexican residents who were born in the US, which is still only 0.5% of the US population (barely enough to be noticeable in an election), but still close to 8X as many as the US-born Chinese. And there's still the question of which state's elections they would vote in?
Also, I don't know about other states, but in Michigan there is a residency requirement. You can't register to vote unless you have been living in the city or township where you are registering for at least 30 days. Are we really supposed to be concerned that thousands of birthright-citizenship Chinese are going to move to Michigan for 30 days, just so that they can register to vote, and then go back home so they can vote absentee? Why would they do that? What's in it for them?
Relating to the "fleeing blue counties" part of your post - Here's an interesting map showing party preference by population:
ReplyDeletehttps://engaging-data.com/county-electoral-map-land-vs-population/
If you go to the info box, and click on "2024", "Population", and "Color by Margin", we see an interesting pattern: the high-population counties (over 1 million) are predominantly blue, or at most slightly pink, while all the strong reds are well under 1 million people. I think what is happening is this:
- Counties with over 1 million people are crowded, expensive to live in, and generally unpleasant to live in.
- People in those counties that think the Democrats are more likely to deal with issues that result from overcrowding than the Republicans are, vote them into office.
-People who don't believe the Democrats can accomplish much, leave.
So, I think it isn't so much that "the Democrats are chasing people out of the blue counties", as "overcrowding causes both the Democrats to get into power, and the people to want to leave". Two mostly separate effects with a single cause.
The "Democrats"* of Minneapolis aren't dealing with the issue, they are creating it. They are anti-family, anti-ownership, anti-landlord, anti-capitalist, anti-car, anti-people. They think everyone should ride there bikes or ride mass transit. But they designed the light rail to have no barriers or ticket entrances,. Expecting it to be the honor system. What has happened is homeless (drug addicted) ride for free and make it unsafe.
ReplyDelete100+ million dollar buildings downtown are selling for pennies in the dollar.
It was the economic engine of the state. It is now a wasteland.
6 1/3 of the 13 city council members are self avowed Marxist socialists.
There are people moving out of the state, and people moving in. The taxable income of those moves is declining greatly.
That shouldn't have been anonymous
ReplyDelete