Pages

Thursday, September 11, 2025

Having A Psychotic Boss Leads To The Assassination Of Charlie Kirk

I've been pondering this concept for a while and the shocking assassination of Charlie Kirk yesterday forced it to the surface.

What is the next logical step after this?

How about the radicalization of the Democrats?

The Democrats get a large percent of their money from small donors which means the base. As their popularity declines, so does their pool of donors. As their popularity declines, their base becomes more and more radical because the squishier ones leave. Their popularity is now at historic lows.

As their popularity decreases, they are forced to spiral in towards their far-left base which means their rhetoric has to become more and more frenzied and hateful to keep the money flowing. Hence "the end of Democracy" and "fascists" and all the rest.

If their starting point was that everyone who disagreed with them was a racist, a homophobe, a transphobe, a fascist and more, where else can they go as their base moves farther and farther left?

How do you appeal to psychotics?

Addendum

It is nearly impossible to be a conservative and not understand the left's positions because we marinate in them every day. They permeate our entertainment, schools and news media. We bathe in the water of the left.

It is very common for the progressives to have no idea why conservatives think like they do because people like Charlie Kirk have been edited out of their world. I can't tell you how many news sources and public figures described Charlie as "divisive" and then cherry-picked some of his positions, putting them in the worst light possible. They deliberately removed all neutral reference points. They wanted you to hate him.

As the left spirals down into their base, their base stays whipped into a frenzy of ignorant, self-reinforced hate. That's a recipe for more and more violence.

More than that, Charlie Kirk along with Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh and lots of other thought leaders on the right make it a habit to speak in large, public forums and then make sure the progressives in the audience get an unedited, uninterrupted chance to challenge them in the Q&A.

That dialog was precisely what Charlie was doing when they shot him. 

You punish the things you don't want repeated. If you're going to punish free and open conversations about politics, be prepared for the alternative.

One more thing. Ben Shapiro made a typically brilliant observation about Charlie's assassination. This spells the end of open-air presentations like this. From now on, the venues for these things will be enclosed, tightly controlled and necessarily smaller. If you saw photos of Charlie's event yesterday, you'll see why this is a bad thing for all Americans. That crowd was huge.

Thursday, September 04, 2025

The 8th Air Force And Islam In Europe

I know this is a detour from my series on Be Nice, Don't Judge in the Diocese of San Diego, but I just got a brain wave on a topic I've been pondering for years.

What will the world be like for us when Europe and Canada become Islamic? Given demographic trends, we're on track for that. 

What if the end result is a 1950s America where we prosper because our competition has been bombed into the Stone Age and we're the only ones with a functional, advanced economy? The analogy isn't perfect as we would share the spoils with Asia in a way we didn't in the 1950s, but the idea might be the same.

Is there a difference between the 8th Air Force and Islam?

Think about this: there isn't a single Muslim country where there are significant manufacturing, software development or investment industries. Quick, name an automobile brand that comes from an Islamic country. You can't because there isn't one.

It's not that they don't have resources, manpower or cash. There are plenty of Islamic countries awash in all three. It must be something cultural. I won't go into it here, but if you have read What Went Wrong by Bernard Lewis, it makes sense. Here's the book's blurb from Amazon.

For centuries, the world of Islam was in the forefront of human achievement -- the foremost military and economic power in the world, the leader in the arts and sciences of civilization. Christian Europe was seen as an outer darkness of barbarism and unbelief from which there was nothing to learn or to fear. And then everything changed. The West won victory after victory, first on the battlefield and then in the marketplace.

In this elegantly written volume, Bernard Lewis, a renowned authority an Islamic affairs, examines the anguished reaction of the Islamic world as it tried to make sense of how it had been overtaken, overshadowed, and dominated by the West. In a fascinating portrait of a culture in turmoil, Lewis shows how the Middle East turned its attention to understanding European weaponry, industry, government, education, and culture. He also describes how some Middle Easterners fastened blame on a series of scapegoats, while others asked not "Who did this to us?" but rather "Where did we go wrong?"

A lot of things went right for America in the 1950s. One of the chief among them was the fact that Europe and Japan were skeletons of their former economic selves. Are we headed back to those halcyon days once Britain, France, Germany and Canada become Islamic Republics?

Allahu Akbar, indeed.

Wednesday, September 03, 2025

Who Are The Marginalized? Not You

After Bishop Devouring Mother smothered us with treacle at the recent Synodality Meeting, we got another earful about the marginalized from the pulpit on Sunday.

Who are the marginalized? Well, the homeless, the addicts, the migrants, the LGBTQWERTY crew, non-whites and women in general.

Recently, an illegal got a trucker's license from a deep blue state where they love the marginalized. Illiterate and ignorant of traffic laws or signs, he made a U-turn on an expressway from the right-hand lane and killed three people.

He is the marginalized. The people he killed are not the marginalized. Get that through your head, you judgmental bigot.

In Milan, a North African migrant beat and raped an 18-year old girl. I'm not going to post the details here, they are simply too horrible. He is the marginalized, not the girl.

The Marginalized Are Fetish Porn

Thinking about this, I came up with a definition of pornography. It is exaggerated sensory input designed to stimulate your particular desires. The porn star who is hung like a horse, the porn star with a D-cup, the family of migrants with eyes like anime characters, the homeless man who lost his job, they're all porn, some for the pervert, some for the be nice, don't judge crowd. The be nice, don't judge type love the way the marginalized excite their devouring mother fetish and give them a fantasy about cuddling and protecting and uplifting the weak and needy.

Here, we see two migrants, a transgender, a homeless person and a gay dude.

One of the worst things you can do to someone who is enjoying porn is to mess with their inputs. Imagine having a wonderful session with your laptop and someone presses the F11 key and your browser pans out to show you the camera and sound crew filming whatever filth you're enjoying. What a total buzzkill!

That's who we are to the Catholic Charities people, the bishops, the Church of England, Lutheran Charities and the race-obsessed progressives when we ask about the people killed by the illegal trucker or the girl raped by the North African. It's also why the churches and politicians are so silent about the victims. No one wants to be that guy, the one that wonders aloud if all this thrilling content featuring the "marginalized" is just so much porn.

The Real Penalty For Apostasy

Dig this. It gives you the true penalty for pulling back the camera on the porn - social isolation for you and yours.

That was Graham Linehan, a British comedy writer who got arrested coming off the plane at Heathrow. His story can be found here. It's worth a read to get a good sense of the direction the Elites are taking us all.