Wednesday, July 20, 2016

Loins?

How can they have loins? They don't even have legs. They're fish.

6 comments:

IlĂ­on said...

As you may (or may not) know, according to Tru-Blu DarwinDefenders, *we* are also fish. So, maybe these loins are from the missing-link tilapia.

K T Cat said...

Nothing's worse than missing Tilapia, particularly when you want to make Gulf Fish Eugenie.

tim eisele said...

After abruptly realizing that I wasn't quite sure what part of the body was the "loin", I looked it up. It turns out that in mammals, it is the cut of meat that starts at the last rib, and runs down the sides of the backbone to the pelvis.

Which I guess works on a fish, too, if you take the pelvic fins to be equivalent to a pelvis. It's still weird terminology, though; most people would just call that cut a fillet and leave it at that.

Kelly the little black dog said...

I suspect its the result of a bad translation.

K T Cat said...

I think Kelly is right. This smacks of Chinglish or Japanglish.

lee said...

And I would DEFINITELY stay away from TIliapia, in general, and Tilapia from China in particular...